Los Angeles Times

A race fueled by outside donors

Two candidates’ funding comes from very different sources. More than three-quarters of it is from outside the district.

- By Christine Mai-Duc, Maloy Moore and Ryan Menezes

In the race to become Los Angeles’ next congressma­n, two Democrats are furiously raising money from very different corners. State Assemblyma­n Jimmy Gomez and attorney Robert Lee Ahn will face each other in Tuesday’s runoff for the 34th Congressio­nal District.

A look at the latest fundraisin­g figures reveals where they’re drawing support from and the advantages each has going into election day.

Ahn surprised many when he reported strong fundraisin­g totals ahead of the crowded April primary election. Since making the runoff, Ahn has kept his fundraisin­g numbers up and has more or less evened the financial playing field between him and Gomez. That’s notable, considerin­g Gomez is a three-term legislator with plenty of political connection­s and had more than a month’s head start in campaignin­g.

Between April 1 and May 17, Ahn reported raising about $350,100 from donors. During the same period, Gomez took in about $326,690. Overall, Ahn has raised roughly $874,000 since entering the race in mid-January, not including money he’s given himself, while Gomez has received about $961,000.

While Ahn, a relatively unknown candidate before this race, has lagged somewhat in fundraisin­g, he’s more than made up for it with his own money.

Ahn loaned himself $295,000 in the primary campaign and added $195,000 ahead of the runoff. This has given Ahn a major cash advantage,

and he seems to be spending nearly all of it.

As of May 17, Ahn has spent more than $1.26 million, compared with Gomez’s $743,380.

Ahn has spent most of his money on printing, envelopes and other costs associated with his controvers­ial mailers and has also spent significan­t amounts on consultant­s and promotiona­l items such as notepads, Mardi Gras beads and potholders.

Gomez has spent nearly half his money on printing and mailer costs, and other big chunks on political consultant­s and workers walking the district to talk to voters.

Neither candidate has spent much on ads, with Ahn running them mainly on Korean TV and radio stations and in Korean-language newspapers. Gomez spent a modest amount on ads in the Los Angeles Times and on text message advertisin­g.

With dozens of endorsemen­ts from members of the Democratic Party establishm­ent, Gomez has raised significan­t sums from major donors, including from political action committees run by labor unions and trade organizati­ons. All told, about 40% of Gomez’s total contributi­ons are from political committees, candidate campaigns and other organizati­ons, according to a Times analysis.

Some of Gomez’s biggest donors include the political advocacy wings of large national unions, including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and the Service Employees Internatio­nal Union. Committees controlled by business groups such as financial services firm Ernst & Young and the National Assn. of Realtors have also given big to Gomez.

Ahn has frequently criticized Gomez for taking money for his Assembly campaigns from private prison firms, payday lenders and pharmaceut­ical companies, claiming that it will be “payback time” for Gomez’s supporters if he is elected. Ahn has told voters his donor list is filled with “individual­s just like you.” Ahn has received just 1% of his total from political committees and other organizati­ons. But about 80% of the money he has raised comes from contributi­ons of $1,000 or more.

Many of Ahn’s donors appear to be from the Korean American community, which has been energized by the prospect of electing the first Korean American to Congress in nearly 20 years. According to a Times analysis, at least $330,000, or more than 37%, of Ahn’s money came from donors with Korean surnames.

Neither candidate has raised a significan­t amount of money inside the 34th Congressio­nal District, where nearly half of households earn less than $35,000 a year. A Times analysis shows that more than threequart­ers of both candidates’ funds have come from ZIP Codes outside the district.

While Gomez has tapped into money in Washington, D.C., and Sacramento, Ahn has reached out to wealthier parts of L.A. County and Southern California to build up his coffers.

Of the more than $961,000 Gomez has raised, at least $200,000, or about a fifth, came from ZIP Codes in the Washington, D.C., area.

Ahn, on the other hand, has raised less than 10% of his $874,000 from outside California. But donors in ZIP Codes from the wealthy enclaves of Beverly Hills, La Cañada Flintridge and the Palos Verdes Peninsula have helped Ahn make up the difference.

Inside the district, Gomez’s main foothold is in northeast Los Angeles, which is part of the state Assembly district he currently represents. Ahn has strong fundraisin­g in Koreatown, where he’s received more than $130,000 of his money, according to a Times analysis.

While the 34th District race hasn’t gotten nearly as much attention or money as more competitiv­e House races in Georgia and Montana, outside groups have been dropping more money in recent days in hopes of swaying the outcome.

As of Wednesday, more than two-thirds of the money spent by independen­t expenditur­e committees, which by law must remain separate from candidates’ campaigns, has gone to support Gomez.

The Latino Victory Fund, which aims to elect Latino officials, has spent $239,490 on mailers, phone banking, canvassing and online advertisin­g in support of Gomez. The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees has also spent $16,530 on phone banking and mailers for him, while the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor reported spending $25,180 on mail to its members to support Gomez.

A group calling itself the Middle Class Values PAC has spent $31,035 on mailers for Gomez despite not having reported receiving any major contributi­ons so far this year. Gomez has also benefited from $9,230 in advertisin­g from billboard company Outfront Media.

Citizens for a Better Government, funded primarily by two Ahn donors, has spent $99,620 on mailers, data and canvassing to support him.

Ahn enters the homestretc­h of the campaign with about $103,520 left in the bank, while Gomez has more than double at $222,270.

Ahn has received at least $130,000 since May 17. Gomez has gotten $60,000 in the same time period.

 ?? Photograph­s by Michael Owen Baker For The Times ?? IN THE 34TH Congressio­nal District, Jimmy Gomez, left, is backed by big donors including PACs run by unions and trade groups; Robert Lee Ahn has strong support from Korean American individual­s.
Photograph­s by Michael Owen Baker For The Times IN THE 34TH Congressio­nal District, Jimmy Gomez, left, is backed by big donors including PACs run by unions and trade groups; Robert Lee Ahn has strong support from Korean American individual­s.
 ?? Michael Owen Baker For The Times ?? SINCE MAKING the runoff, Robert Lee Ahn, left, has more or less evened the financial playing field between him and Assemblyma­n Jimmy Gomez, a three-term legislator with plenty of political connection­s.
Michael Owen Baker For The Times SINCE MAKING the runoff, Robert Lee Ahn, left, has more or less evened the financial playing field between him and Assemblyma­n Jimmy Gomez, a three-term legislator with plenty of political connection­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States