Los Angeles Times

Putin praises hackers as ‘patriotic’

He denies Kremlin mounted cyberattac­ks but says other Russians may have.

- By Sabra Ayres Ayres is a special correspond­ent.

MOSCOW — After months of categorica­lly denying Russian involvemen­t in cyberattac­ks during last year’s U.S. presidenti­al election, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday that although the Kremlin has never used statespons­ored cyberattac­ks to meddle in other countries’ elections, some “patriotica­lly minded” volunteer hackers may have acted on their own to defend Russian interests.

“Hackers can be anywhere and pop out from anywhere in the world,” Putin said in an address to Russian and foreign media during the opening day of an annual economic forum in St. Petersburg, Russia.

The Russian president compared hackers to artists who can act creatively, particular­ly when they are motivated by internatio­nal relations and in the defense of Russia’s interests.

“If they woke up today, read that there is something happening in interstate relations,” he said. “If they are patriotic, they start contributi­ng, as they see it, in the fight against those who do not speak well about Russia.”

Putin’s comments are a departure from the strong denials from what the Kremlin has been saying for months since the United States intelligen­ce community accused Russia of orchestrat­ing the hacking of the Democratic National Convention’s emails, a move that was seen as aiding the election of Donald Trump.

While reiteratin­g that Russia was not conducting cyberattac­ks “on the state level,” Putin’s suggestion that individual freelance Russian hackers could be operating on their own sounded similar to statements he made in 2014, when he first denied the presence of Russian troops in Crimea.

Then, months after the annexation of Crimea, Russia said in a statement that the Kremlin had in fact sent troops in to the Black Sea peninsula to protect Russian interests.

Like President Trump, Putin has dismissed media reports accusing the Trump administra­tion of colluding with Russia to influence the U.S. election as “fake news.”

On Thursday, he blamed a growing “anti-Russian” campaign in the media that he said was rooted in the West’s goal of monopolizi­ng power and preventing Russia from emerging on the world stage as a global player. Such “Russophobi­a” was counterpro­ductive, Putin said.

Putin said the campaign had gone so far as to place Russia on the same threat level as Islamic State.

“We see, let’s say, what is happening in the United States. This anti-Russian campaign, Russophobi­a continues,” Putin said. “How will the situation develop? We do not know. It does not depend on us. We are not the initiators of this process.”

Since coming to power in 2000, Putin has tried to assert Russia as an emerging power and himself as a global leader. At home, his popularity remains high even as the economy continues to struggle under the weight of low global oil prices and economic sanctions placed on the Kremlin after the 2014 annexation of Crimea.

“Some time ago, our partners in individual countries or groups of countries began to make attempts to contain Russia, to restrain its legitimate desire to safeguard its national interests by undertakin­g any actions that are not within the framework of internatio­nal law, including economic restrictio­ns,” he said.

Such sanctions have had “zero effect,” Putin said.

Russia has no choice but to build up its military defense systems in the Pacific region in response to the challenge of America’s deployment of the antimissil­e system to South Korea to counter a North Korean missile threat, and to Washington’s plans to improve a launch site for antiballis­tic missiles in Ft. Greely, Alaska, he said.

“Should we just stand idly by and watch this? Of course not,” Putin said. “We are thinking about how to respond to these challenges.”

By most accounts, the Kremlin was initially positive about Trump’s victory in November over Hillary Clinton, whom Putin sees as promoting an anti-Russia agenda. But Trump has yet to meet with the Russian president face-to-face, and the White House stance on Russia remains unclear despite campaign rhetoric from the Trump campaign that praised Putin’s leadership.

Putin said Thursday that Russia was patiently waiting for the “anti-Russian hysteria in the U.S.” to subside before any productive relationsh­ip could be establishe­d between Washington and Moscow.

The two presidents are expected to meet for the first time during a Group of 20 summit in Hamburg, Germany, next month.

“Of course, we are ready for the dialogue with the U.S. president, and we don’t know how these relations will evolve considerin­g in the U.S. there is a continuing fight that doesn’t allow them to build relations,” Putin said. “When it comes to our friendship with Donald Trump, how can you be friends with a person you don’t know?”

Until a personal meeting happens, Putin said, he can’t predict the nature of their relations.

“This is a person with a fresh view of things, even if anyone likes it or not. But it brings certain benefits,” he said.

Some analysts say the Kremlin is more concerned about the scandal’s effect on the U.S. audience than its statements have let on.

“When faced with uncertaint­y, the Kremlin frequently takes a default position with that kind of uncertaint­y in the form of a ‘wait and see’ rather than to take a positive position,” said Robert Legvold, a professor at Columbia University and an expert on foreign policy in the post-Soviet states.

“If things get cloudy and there’s not real progress, the Russian position of ‘wait and see’ will mean that nothing will happen when it comes to improving U.S. Russian relations,” Legvold said.

For the Kremlin, a presidenti­al face-to-face will hold more weight. What comes out of that meeting could be the first step in setting the agenda for U.S.-Russian relations.

“Tactically, I think there is a very intensive buildup to their personal meeting,” said Vladimir Milov, a liberal politician and former deputy energy minister. “There are fair chances that the meeting will result in establishi­ng a strong, very warm and direct contact between Trump and Putin, and with very strong strategic implicatio­ns.”

For one thing, the two leaders may find a lot of personal common ground and similariti­es and will probably get along. “They understand each other; I mean they have the same language, the same body language,” Milov said.

Despite frustratio­ns with the uncertaint­ies of the White House strategy on Russia and the deepening election-meddling investigat­ions, many believe Putin is sincere when he says he remains patient with Trump.

In what could be a slight boost to Russia’s struggling economy, Russia last month agreed with OPEC to increase oil prices. This could satisfy Russia’s domestic economic woes and buy Putin more time to wait for Trump to emerge from the investigat­ions.

“Putin is exceptiona­lly good at recruitmen­t skills. This is what they taught him at the KGB school,” Milov said. “He will look him in the eye, show him his soul, once again as he did with [President George W.] Bush, and say, ‘Donald, I’m 100% on your side. I’m your guy.’ ”

“From then on, whatever happens will be determined also by Trump, who I believe was inclined to make a grand bargain with Putin from Day One,” Milov said.

 ?? Alexei Druzhinin Pool Photo ?? RUSSIAN President Vladimir Putin, right, shown at an economic forum in St. Petersburg, Russia, denies colluding with Donald Trump’s presidenti­al campaign.
Alexei Druzhinin Pool Photo RUSSIAN President Vladimir Putin, right, shown at an economic forum in St. Petersburg, Russia, denies colluding with Donald Trump’s presidenti­al campaign.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States