Los Angeles Times

Thanks, Internet

Re “The decline of our discourse,” editorial June 4

-

When personal computers and the Internet became ubiquitous, civility was dealt a final blow. It’s so easy to be nasty and cruel sitting at a keyboard, never seeing what impact the nastiness and vulgarity are having on the recipients of such missives.

When families stopped having at least dinner together at the same time and at the same table, simple manners stopped being taught; ordinary courtesies like “please” and “thank you” seem not to have been taught in years. The art and grace of communicat­ion are dead.

It was said decades ago that “small minds discuss people; average minds discuss events; great minds discuss ideas.” Modernly, as the New Yorker cartoon put it, “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.” Stephany Yablow North Hollywood

Day after day, the frontpage headlines of your newspaper ring with negativity toward the president and his policies.

For people who take the time to read, this editorial imbalance of coverage masqueradi­ng as news alienates and angers those who accept the outcome of the election. At the same time, it fuels the angst of those who do not.

Now, your editorial board attempts to come to the rescue by telling us “we must do better.” Your newspaper is in a perfect position to lead the way. Judd Frank

Laguna Niguel

As The Times avers, the decline of our national discourse should alarm us all. Whom to blame may be fairly debated.

Trump, for his part, parlayed astute reading of an increasing­ly dumbeddown, titillatio­n-seeking public into stunning campaign successes. Once the GOP candidate debates devolved into name-calling — and kept audiences enthralled — there was no stopping a reality-TV huckster.

Democrats, for all the civility of their party’s debates, could only cringe and hope that sanity prevailed at the polls. No such luck. Since President Trump assumed office, Democrats and independen­ts have had abundant cause to perceive an existentia­l threat to democracy. Who can fault them for abandoning civility?

If Trump “follows the culture as much as he leads it,” he encouraged incivility as the new standard for discourse. Sandra Perez

Santa Maria

You write, “There’s a tendency on the left to lay this at the feet of Trump, but that is facile.”

Agreed. But saying that misses the point of the responsibi­lity of leaders in our society to be role models for public civility.

Our parents, teachers and other leaders model behavior for us. Their influence doesn’t normally bounce away from us; but rather, it serves as an enduring benchmark to live our lives responsibl­y — to listen and be tolerant objective and always open and honest with others. Those characteri­stics are today often missing from the leaders who help construct us as individual­s.

So please, don’t let Trump off the hook.

And while we’re discussing the influence, I should point out something obvious: Members of the gender known for tolerance and addressing problems with words and not violence are awfully underrepre­sented in both public and private-sector leadership. Donald Funk

Redondo Beach

 ?? Eduardo Munoz Alvarez Getty Images ?? A POLICE officer tries to separate pro- and antiTrump activists in New York on April 29.
Eduardo Munoz Alvarez Getty Images A POLICE officer tries to separate pro- and antiTrump activists in New York on April 29.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States