Los Angeles Times

State with nation’s highest ozone levels plans to cut emissions, in spite of move from Trump administra­tion.

- By Tony Barboza

California officials say they are forging ahead with emissions-cutting measures despite the Trump administra­tion’s move this week to delay implementa­tion of Obamaera limits on ozone, the lung-searing gas in smog.

U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency Administra­tor Scott Pruitt told governors Tuesday that he was extending by one year a deadline for them to determine which areas of their states violate federal standards for the pollutant, citing what he said was a lack of informatio­n and “increased regulatory burdens, restrictio­ns on infrastruc­ture investment, and increased costs to businesses.”

“We are committed to working with states and local officials to effectivel­y implement the ozone standard in a manner that is supportive of air quality improvemen­t efforts without interferin­g with local decisions or impeding economic growth,” Pruitt said in a statement.

The extension applies to a tougher 70-parts-per-billion limit on ozone the Obama administra­tion EPA adopted in October 2015.

The move is the latest in a series of steps Pruitt has taken to roll back or delay Obama-era environmen­tal protection­s. The decision is ex-

pected to push back federal deadlines to reach the health standard, allowing states with dirty air, including California, to put off the adoption of pollution-reduction measures.

California state regulators insisted that Pruitt’s decision would in no way delay the state’s progress in cleaning the air.

“California is forging ahead with aggressive actions to reduce ozone levels, irrespecti­ve of EPA’s delay,” California Air Resources Board spokesman Stanley Young said. “In the meantime, we believe that EPA cannot back off on its own responsibi­lity to set cleaner standards.”

Young cited the “critical public health challenge” of air pollution in Los Angeles and the San Joaquin Valley. He said steps that California regulators are taking to reduce emissions in the freight and transporta­tion sector “will put us on the trajectory for meeting the 70 [parts per billion] standard in any case.”

Ozone is a corrosive gas that forms when emissions from smokestack­s and tailpipes cook in the heat and sunlight.

It can trigger asthma and other respirator­y illnesses. Southern California has the nation’s worst ozone pollution and remains far from meeting a series of previous federal air quality standards.

Environmen­talists blasted the EPA’s move as a step toward rolling back the Obama administra­tion’s clean-air standards and allowing industries to avoid stronger emissions controls.

“This delay is a flagrant violation of the law that denies Americans their right to safe air free from unhealthy smog pollution,” said John Walke, clean air director for the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmen­tal group.

Industry groups waged a fierce lobbying and advertisin­g campaign against the 2015 ozone rules, saying they would harm businesses by requiring costly new pollution controls.

In his previous job as attorney general of Oklahoma, Pruitt was one of the top legal adversarie­s seeking to block the EPA’s regulation­s on climate change, clean water and air quality, suing the Obama administra­tion over its 2015 ozone standards and other major environmen­tal rules.

After Trump appointed Pruitt administra­tor, the EPA began reexaminin­g its ozone rules.

EPA records show all 50 states and the District of Columbia submitted recommenda­tions last year on which areas should be designated as meeting or violating ozone limits. None said they had insufficie­nt informatio­n to do so.

The EPA did not respond to requests for comment, including questions about what specific informatio­n it lacks and the potential health consequenc­es of the delay.

Republican lawmakers who have long been critical of Obama’s environmen­tal regulation­s applauded Pruitt’s decision.

“This regulation was yet another attack on the middle class by the Obama administra­tion and was forced through despite significan­t concern from communitie­s across the country,” U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said in a statement.

Tougher ozone standards, achieved quickly, would benefit tens of millions of Americans who live in counties with unhealthy air.

That includes 17 million people in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties who breathe the nation’s worst polluted air. After decades of reducing ozone levels, progress has faltered in recent years.

This year, ozone has ex2037 ceeded the 70 ppb standard on 37 days. That’s up from 33 days during the same time last year and 21 days in 2015, according to South Coast Air Quality Management District data through Monday.

Clean-air advocates say that means California pollution regulators must do more locally to reduce emissions.

California adopted its own 70 ppb ozone standard in 2005, citing the threat to children’s health.

AQMD spokesman Sam Atwood said “the best path forward toward meeting this standard is the one we are on now — implementi­ng all feasible measures, fostering cleaner technologi­es and accelerati­ng deployment of zero- and near-zero technologi­es.”

In 2015, the EPA estimated that achieving the 70 ppb limit by its 2025 deadline would prevent hundreds of thousands of asthma attacks and missed school days for children and hundreds of early deaths from cardiovasc­ular disease and other illnesses. It also said the savings from those health benefits would outweigh the billions of dollars in annual costs to the industry by about 4-1.

Obama gave California extra time to comply — until — because of the severity of its air pollution.

California air quality officials say they expect the EPA to extend the deadline until 2038.

Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is required to review its air quality standards for ozone and other pollutants every five years and adjust them if necessary to reflect the latest health science.

Ozone is such a widespread pollutant that obligation­s to keep reducing it have vexed previous administra­tions.

The administra­tion of George W. Bush rejected recommenda­tions for a tougher limit when it adopted the 2008 ozone standard of 75 ppb.

Obama’s EPA vowed to tighten ozone rules but set aside EPA administra­tor Lisa Jackson’s recommenda­tion for a 65 ppb standard during his reelection bid, leaving the Bush administra­tion limit in place.

When his administra­tion ultimately tightened the standard in 2015, it selected a less protective standard than the 60 ppb public health groups had endorsed.

‘California is forging ahead with aggressive actions to reduce ozone levels, irrespecti­ve of EPA’s delay.’ — Stanley Young California Air Resources Board spokesman

 ?? Shawn Thew European Pressphoto Agency ?? EPA ADMINISTRA­TOR Scott Pruitt delivers remarks after President Trump announced the U.S. was withdrawin­g from the Paris climate accord during a Rose Garden event at the White House on June 1.
Shawn Thew European Pressphoto Agency EPA ADMINISTRA­TOR Scott Pruitt delivers remarks after President Trump announced the U.S. was withdrawin­g from the Paris climate accord during a Rose Garden event at the White House on June 1.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States