Los Angeles Times

Sheriff pans ACLU report on O.C. jails

Sandra Hutchens disputes 2-year study, saying the facts were ‘purposely distorted.’

- By Adam Elmahrek adam.elmahrek@latimes.com Twitter: @AdamElmahr­ek

Under intense scrutiny over her handling of Orange County’s jails, Sheriff Sandra Hutchens railed Wednesday against a scathing report on jail conditions released this week by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, saying the report was rife with inaccuraci­es and “purposely distorted” facts.

She also insisted that her announceme­nt Tuesday that she will not seek reelection in 2018 — which came within hours of the ACLU report’s release and advocates’ calls for her to resign — had nothing to do with the report or those demands.

“I’m not going to call it an investigat­ion,” Hutchens said about the ACLU’s 104-page report, which was the result of what the group described as a two-year investigat­ion, “because it doesn’t rise to that level in my mind.”

Hutchens was appointed in 2008 after former Sheriff Michael S. Carona was indicted on federal public corruption charges. She was widely seen as a reformer of a troubled agency, and her first years were marked by widespread popularity.

That reputation has been tainted by an ongoing scandal involving the use of jailhouse informants, and three inmates’ daring escape last year from Central Men’s Jail in Santa Ana. The deputies union blamed the jailbreak on staffing shortages, among other alleged missteps.

The ACLU report was the latest set of allegation­s to rock the county’s jail system. The report painted the jails as plagued by violence and unsanitary conditions, with deputies regularly assaulting inmates for no lawful reason and instigatin­g fights among them.

The report also alleged that people slept on floors in holding cells in the booking area and that the cells were smeared with human waste.

Hutchens disputed some of the points in the report at a news conference Wednesday and said her office was not contacted for the other side of the story.

Of the 108 recommenda­tions in the report, all but one — an independen­t civilian oversight body — have been implemente­d, she said.

She sought to minimize the ACLU report’s findings by pointing out that there were 350,000 bookings over the course of time considered by the group, and that the surveys of former inmates represente­d only a tiny fraction of the people who cycle through.

She also disputed allegation­s of overcrowdi­ng, saying that the jails have an 18% vacancy rate, with one facility at 42%.

The 48 jail deaths cited in the report were an even smaller fraction of the number of people booked, Hutchens said, and many people arrive with preexistin­g health conditions.

Contrary to the ACLU report, she contended, inmates are given adequate mental health care, and pregnant women and transgende­r people have access to special medical services.

Responding to a question about numerous inmates surveyed reporting similar experience­s — such as being forced to eat meals in only two or three minutes — Hutchens said incredulou­sly, “I’d be interested in why they did not come forward while they were in custody.”

She added, “That makes me suspect.”

The sheriff also denied rumors that she was stepping down because of health concerns. A breast cancer survivor, Hutchens said the disease has not returned.

“I don’t have an illness,” she said. “I’m fine.”

More time with family, she said, was among the reasons motivating her decision.

Regarding her legacy, she hopes she “empowered the people who work for me” to make their own decisions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States