Los Angeles Times

Trump’s new surrogate sets a softer tone

Anthony Scaramucci gives polished — and far less combative — performanc­e as face of the White House.

- By Laura King

WASHINGTON — Six months into his presidency, an embattled Donald Trump may finally have found the mouthpiece he wants — a fellow New York tycoon who gushes about his “love” for the president and blames White House woes on poor communicat­ion, not a burgeoning scandal.

Anthony Scaramucci, Trump’s new communicat­ions director, appeared confident and polished in a series of Sunday TV talkshow appearance­s as the White House girds for what may be a crucial week in the multiple investigat­ions into the Trump campaign’s possible connection­s to Russia.

Trump’s son-in-law and senior advisor, Jared Kushner, will appear behind closed doors in the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee on Monday and in the House committee on Tuesday, the first official in the Trump White House known to do so.

Lawmakers are expected to question Kushner about several hot-button issues for the FBI and the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, who is leading a separate criminal investigat­ion.

They include Kushner’s meeting in June 2016 with a Russian lawyer who has represente­d Moscow’s spy service and another meeting with the then-Russian ambassador in which Kushner reportedly discussed setting up a secret back-channel communicat­ion to the Kremlin.

Scaramucci can be expected to try to turn the spotlight away from Russia, or least argue that Kushner’s cooperatio­n shows the White House has nothing to hide.

Of all the Trump surrogates trotted out in recent months, the 53-year-old former Wall Street hedge fund manager turned in a performanc­e far smoother — and far less combative — than figures like Sean Spicer, whose awkward TV appearance­s were widely mocked before he quit last week rather than work for Scaramucci.

Or than Stephen Miller, the senior White House advisor who stared stone-faced into the camera in February and declared that presidenti­al authority “will not be questioned.”

During appearance­s on three major news talk shows, Scaramucci artfully pivoted away from troublesom­e topics — with a burst of candor, by changing the subject, by evoking the bluecollar roots he shares with many in Trump’s base, or just with a disarming quip.

Even amid sharp exchanges, his manner remained resolutely genial.

Are the president’s tweets a problem? No. Did Trump discuss his ability to grant pardons? Yes, but none will be needed. Does the president believe Russia meddled in the 2016 campaign? Maybe not — but

Scaramucci vowed to tell Trump if he thought the president was wrong about that, or anything else.

Scaramucci repeatedly argued that the White House needs to fix its messaging and public relations operation, not its legislativ­e agenda or its policies.

“Listen, there’s obviously a communicat­ions problem,” he declared on CNN’s “State of the Union,” even while citing “phenomenal achievemen­ts” for Trump’s presidency. “I just think we need to deliver the messaging a little bit differentl­y than we have been doing it in the past.”

He insisted that disarray inside the White House can largely be blamed on unauthoriz­ed leaks by White House staff members to the news media, which he pledged to halt, drasticall­y if necessary.

“They’re going to get fired. I’m just going to make it very, very clear, OK? Tomorrow I’m going to have a staff meeting,” he said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “And it’s going to be a very binary thing. I’m not going to make any prejudgmen­ts about anybody on that staff. If they want to stay on the staff, they’re going to stop leaking.… But if you’re going to keep leaking, I’m going to fire everybody.”

Scaramucci says he likes to use jokes to make a point, but his self-deprecatin­g quips can land flat sometimes.

After praising the podium skills of Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who was elevated to principal White House spokeswoma­n to replace Spicer, Scaramucci added — specifical­ly addressing Sanders — “I loved the hair and makeup person that we had on Friday.”

After he later was slammed online for seemingly grading a subordinat­e by her appearance, Scaramucci quickly went on Twitter to declare he was talking about his own hair and makeup, not hers. He used the hashtag #humor.

In keeping with Trump’s insistence that those who work for him should look the part, Scaramucci comes off well sartoriall­y.

Trump had complained vociferous­ly about an ill-fitting suit that Spicer wore for his first turn at the White House lectern, a wardrobe choice immortaliz­ed in comedian Melissa McCarthy’s skewering of Spicer on “Saturday Night Live.”

But staying on message amid a murky, slow-grinding scandal with many moving parts can be difficult. In his appearance on “Fox News Sunday,” Scaramucci casually contradict­ed a senior member of the president’s personal legal team, Jay Sekulow.

Sekulow said on ABC’s “This Week” that pardons were not under discussion; Scaramucci acknowledg­ed Trump himself had recently brought up the topic.

“I’m in the Oval Office with the president last week, we’re talking about that,” he said on Fox. Trump, he said, “brought that up, he said but he doesn’t have to be pardoned. There’s nobody around him that has to be pardoned. He was just making the statement about the power of pardons.”

Scaramucci was seemingly sanguine about the fact that anyone who speaks for Trump can quickly run afoul of the president. Trump, who spent Sunday at his Virginia golf property, is known to monitor his surrogates’ TV performanc­es.

CNN host Jake Tapper alluded to that, telling Scaramucci after a lengthy exchange about Russia: “I love how you’re talking to one specific viewer right now … the most important audience that there is.”

“I like talking to him,” Scaramucci countered. “But you know who else I’m talking to? The people I grew up with.”

The president is known to prize shows of fealty, and Scaramucci came through in spades: likening Trump to a favorite athletic coach, praising his election victory, hailing him as a “superhard” worker, and full throatedly denying there was anything to the Russia story.

“We’re New Yorkers…. I love the guy,” he said on Fox. “He’s a great person, and he’s going to be a phenomenal — he is a phenomenal president, and he’s going to be a better president.”

But Scaramucci also acknowledg­ed what many critics cite as the main reason Trump has consistent­ly dismissed U.S. intelligen­ce conclusion­s that Russia actively sought to help him win the White House — a belief that his political opponents are trying to tarnish his win.

“One of the reasons why he’s upset about it is … the mainstream media position on this, that they [the Russians] interfered in the election,” Scaramucci said on CNN. “Actually, in his mind, what are you guys suggesting? You are going to delegitimi­ze his victory?”

He showed some sympathy for Trump’s attacks on what he calls “fake news,” which extends to unfavorabl­e coverage. Scaramucci alluded to CNN’s recent withdrawal of an unsubstant­iated story involving him and Russia. Three journalist­s subsequent­ly resigned from the network.

But Sunday on CNN, he held out an olive branch, pledging to “soften up our relationsh­ip with the press.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States