Los Angeles Times

California’s plan to curb racial profiling

New state rules will have local police get demographi­c data on the people they stop.

- LIAM DILLON liam.dillon@latimes.com

SACRAMENTO — This week, California Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra revised rules for how police officers in the state will have to track data aimed at preventing racial profiling.

Starting with the Los Angeles Police Department and other large law enforcemen­t agencies in July 2018, officers will collect informatio­n detailing race, gender and other demographi­c details every time police pull someone over in their car or otherwise detain them.

Here’s why the plan exists, what its author hopes it will accomplish and how the new rules will work:

Why are police department­s going to collect data in the first place?

Civil rights advocates have long argued that police treat blacks, Latinos and other minorities differentl­y than whites. Criminal justice researcher­s have been analyzing data about law enforcemen­t interactio­ns to try to understand police activity.

In Oakland, black men were four times more likely than whites to be searched during traffic stops and were more likely to be handcuffed even if they weren’t arrested, according to a 2016 report from Stanford academics who analyzed the city’s data on police stops.

A more recent Stanford study found that in Los Angeles County, black drivers were stopped more frequently than whites and Latinos.

Researcher­s differ over the value of such data in revealing police racial biases — higher crime rates in some neighborho­ods with large minority population­s could help explain racially disparate stop rates, for instance — but collection efforts are spotty across California. That’s where this initiative comes in.

In 2015, during the height of the Black Lives Matter protests, Assemblywo­man Shirley Weber (D-San Diego) wrote legislatio­n to force every police department in California to collect racial and other demographi­c data when officers stop people. The aim, Weber said, is to inform policy for how police interact with communitie­s of color.

“Data is the best tool for addressing community concerns about racial bias in policing,” Weber said in a statement. “The informatio­n collected will help get us past the debate about whether the problem exists, and instead help us move forward in determinin­g the scope of the problem, who’s targeted and where it might be concentrat­ed.” Where do things stand now?

Weber’s bill required the attorney general’s office to figure out how the data collection process would work.

Would officers have to collect data only on traffic stops, or pedestrian and bike stops as well? Would officers track just racial data, or gender and other demographi­c informatio­n, too? Are there certain situations, such as during an active shooter investigat­ion, where cops wouldn’t need to fill out the forms?

These rules were supposed to be finished by January, but they weren’t. The process was delayed further when Becerra took over for Kamala Harris after her election to the U.S. Senate.

An initial version of the regulation­s gave law enforcemen­t groups heartburn because they believed the process was too burdensome. San Diego’s police chief, for instance, estimated it would take her officers 17,000 hours annually to collect the data required.

Becerra met with police department­s, civil rights groups and researcher­s before releasing this week’s revisions. He also enlisted the LAPD and a handful of other agencies in April to test how officers might tally the demographi­c informatio­n.

Under the revised regulation­s, police officers will have to collect data on nearly every stop they make, including interactio­ns with pedestrian­s and people on bikes.

They’ll have to track a person’s gender, English proficienc­y and any disabiliti­es as well. But in emergencie­s, such as mass evacuation­s during bomb threats or earthquake­s, the rules won’t apply.

Reaction to Becerra’s revision has been slow. Michael Durant, president of the 69,000-member Peace Officers Research Assn. of California, which represents most rank-and-file officers in the state, said his organizati­on was reviewing the new proposal.

The regulation­s still are not final, and Becerra’s office could make more changes.

When will the new rules take effect?

The LAPD and Los Angeles County Sheriff ’s Department and the seven other agencies in California with 1,000 or more officers will begin collecting the data next July and release their first annual reports in April 2019.

Every year, more department­s will be required to start collecting data. By 2022, all police agencies in California will be responsibl­e for doing so.

 ?? Brian van der Brug Los Angeles Times ?? ASSEMBLYWO­MAN Shirley Weber says the law she wrote will “help us move forward” on racial bias.
Brian van der Brug Los Angeles Times ASSEMBLYWO­MAN Shirley Weber says the law she wrote will “help us move forward” on racial bias.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States