Los Angeles Times

Alternativ­es to power plant

Grid operator says clean energy could be subbed for proposed facility at higher cost.

- By Ivan Penn ivan.penn@latimes.com Twitter: @ivanlpenn

Grid operator says clean energy could be subbed for proposed Ventura County plant but at higher cost.

The manager of California’s electric grid told state regulators that clean energy could be substitute­d for a proposed natural gas plant in Ventura County but at a higher cost.

A 46-page report issued late Wednesday by the California Independen­t System Operator offered three alternativ­es to building the Puente natural gas plant in Oxnard, focusing largely on the use of solar power and energy storage to ensure reliabilit­y of electricit­y service in the area. The report also looked at using less electricit­y as an alternativ­e in combinatio­n with things such as storing power in batteries.

The report pegged the new plant’s cost at $299 million while the three alternativ­es would cost $309 million to $1.1 billion.

Even with the statement about potentiall­y higher costs, the report received praise from opponents of the proposed natural gas plant who argue that building the power facility would continue a long practice of locating industrial operations in disadvanta­ged communitie­s. The proposed natural gas plant would replace an older facility.

In addition, Los Angeles Times investigat­ions have shown that the state has overbuilt the electricit­y system, primarily with natural gas plants, and has so much clean energy that it has to shut down some plants while paying other states to take the power California can’t use. The overbuildi­ng has added billions of dollars to ratepayers’ bills in recent years.

“For generation­s, the fossil fuel industry has used Oxnard as a sacrifice zone for polluting power plants under the pretense that we had no better alternativ­es,” said Lucas Zucker, policy and communicat­ions director at Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainabl­e Economy.

“This analysis shows that a better future is possible if the California Energy Commission decides that Oxnard deserves it,” Zucker said. “The people of Oxnard are counting on our state policymake­rs to stop the Puente project and pursue clean energy solutions to power our region.”

The commission still must decide whether to move forward with the proposed natural gas plant or consider clean energy alternativ­es.

Regulators, utilities and the grid operator say there is a need for power plants in the Los Angeles Basin to ensure reliabilit­y of electricit­y service when solar farms in the desert aren’t operating, during natural disasters and as other emergencie­s arise.

Residents in Ventura County have flooded the California Energy Commission in recent months with letters objecting to the project.

They contend that clean energy alternativ­es align more with the state’s objectives to reduce and even eliminate use of fossil fuels.

Under California mandates, 50% of the state’s electricit­y must come from clean energy sources by 2030. State lawmakers are considerin­g a bill that would increase the mandate to 100% by 2045.

 ?? Ricardo DeAratanha Los Angeles Times ?? THE PROPOSED Puente natural gas plant would replace the Mandalay Generating Station, above, in Oxnard. Ventura County residents have f looded state regulators with letters objecting to the project.
Ricardo DeAratanha Los Angeles Times THE PROPOSED Puente natural gas plant would replace the Mandalay Generating Station, above, in Oxnard. Ventura County residents have f looded state regulators with letters objecting to the project.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States