Los Angeles Times

Worker gets raise—and higher healthcare bill

At some companies, the more you earn, the more you pay.

- By Karla L. Miller Workers can seek answers about employerpr­ovided health insurance from the Labor Department’s benefits administra­tion (askebsa.dol.gov). Karla L. Miller writes about work dramas and traumas for the Washington Post.

Question: After my husband receives his annual review and cost-of-living raise, he will be in a new pay bracket. When this happens, the cost of his health insurance will increase as well — way beyond the raise he would receive — so he will be bringing home significan­tly less in his paycheck. His coverage and benefits will not change. Getting a raise is actually going to cost us money! How is this legal? Answer: As healthcare costs have risen in the last two decades, more employers have adopted a “the more you make, the more you pay” approach to healthcare coverage, says Gary Kushner, president of Michigan-based human resources consulting and benefits administra­tion firm Kushner & Co. Generally, under traditiona­l “fully insured” employer-provided plans — in which employers provide healthcare coverage through a third-party insurer — employees can be required to pay a larger share of their healthcare costs based on their age (if the employer is also incurring higher coverage costs based on age) or income, Kushner said.

But just as your employer can adjust employee contributi­ons, it should be able to tweak its rules so rewards don’t become punishment­s. For example, employers can implement “corridors” between pay brackets that allow workers to transition gradually to the higher contributi­on tier, Kushner says. He recommends your husband start by outlining his situation to HR: “This can’t be the result you wanted.”

Alternativ­ely, Pittsburgh lawyer and benefits specialist Terry Connerton suggests seeing if your husband can opt out of employer coverage and get a better deal at HealthCare.gov. Question: My boss has become obsessed with Google’s reviews for our business. He has now made the reviews a mandatory part of the sales process: We literally can’t let customers leave without having them complete a survey, and we’re allowed only four “refusals” every month, for which we have to provide compelling explanatio­ns to the boss. I’m often asked if we are owned by Google when I say we require a review. I have begun to write fake reviews. I know it’s wrong, but I feel it’s worse to strong-arm a client. Answer: As I’m sure you know, the Google My Business review policy frowns on business owners and employees publishing their own reviews. Other users can flag those plants for removal, although deliberate­ly mediocre reviews could probably slip under the radar without helping or harming your employer.

But although that route spares your clients some hassle, it’s not as effective as letting them provide their own feedback. A string of one-star reviews complainin­g about being detained and hounded to fill out surveys — or an on-the-spot conversati­on with the manager including threats to cancel a purchase — stands a better chance of getting the policy changed. Pro tip:

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States