Los Angeles Times

Friend says Durst taped himself

Real estate scion rehearsed testimony for ’03 murder trial, attorney testifies.

- By Marisa Gerber marisa.gerber @latimes.com Twitter: @marisagerb­er

In his third day of testimony, one of Robert Durst’s longtime friends revealed Thursday that he’d previously destroyed tapes of the idiosyncra­tic New York real estate scion practicing what he planned to say during his 2003 murder trial in Texas.

Stewart Altman said that while Durst was behind bars accused of the 2001 killing of a neighbor in Galveston, he’d recorded himself and then given the tapes to Altman.

“I got the tapes, I listened to them and I destroyed them,” said Altman, who has acted as Durst’s personal attorney over the years.

When a prosecutor asked him why, Altman glanced at his personal attorney, who objected to the question, saying it would reveal the work product of his client, who is also an attorney. The judge ruled that Altman didn’t have to answer as it may have been a decision he’d made in preparing for litigation.

Durst, now 74, admitted to shooting neighbor Morris Black in what he said was self-defense during a struggle for a gun, before dismemberi­ng him and throwing the body parts into Galveston Bay. Durst had been hiding out in the city, pretending to be a mute woman, when the killing occurred. Durst testified in the case and was acquitted of murder.

But it is because of the 2000 slaying of his confidante Susan Berman that Durst now awaits a murder trial in Los Angeles. Prosecutor­s have theorized that Durst killed Berman to silence her for what she knew about the 1982 disappeara­nce of his wife, Kathleen.

As Durst — who has pleaded not guilty in Berman’s killing — walked into a Los Angeles courtroom Thursday, he turned to look into the audience. At one point, he locked eyes with Altman and smiled. The eccentric millionair­e is unlikely to go to trial until at least 2018, and the judge has allowed lawyers to preserve early testimony from some older witnesses.

When a prosecutor initially asked Altman whether he had picked up recordings of Durst practicing his testimony in preparatio­n for trial, his attorney invoked Altman’s 5th Amendment right against self-incriminat­ion. But the judge ordered Altman to answer, noting that he didn’t believe Altman had committed a crime and that, if he had, the statute of limitation­s had expired.

Altman then testified to having picked up, listened to and destroyed the tapes.

During Thursday’s hearing, prosecutor­s played a 2002 jail call between Durst — who was in custody awaiting trial in the Galveston case — and his second wife, Debrah Lee Charatan, in which they seemed to be discussing the same practice recordings.

“Do I sound A-plus?” Durst asks. “Do I sound 100% believable?” “Oh, yeah,” she responds. “The tone of my voice sounds sincere?” “Yes.” On Wednesday, Altman testified that he remembered getting a call from Durst a few days after Kathleen went missing. When the prosecutor asked if the defendant had sounded concerned, Altman responded, “no,” adding that his friend’s tone seemed strange.

After that phone call, Altman said, he and Durst never had a more in-depth conversati­on about Kathleen’s disappeara­nce. “Bob didn’t want to talk to me about it,” Altman said. “If he did, he would’ve called me.”

Altman, 74, testified that although he’d been close friends with Kathleen — who prosecutor­s contend was killed by Durst — his allegiance ultimately lies with Durst, not his wife.

“Would you agree,” the prosecutor asked, “that Bob Durst is basically like family to you?”

“Yes,” said Altman, a labor lawyer who went to high school with Durst in Scarsdale, N.Y.

Attorneys for both Durst and Altman argued that Altman should be shielded from testifying under attorney-client privilege, but prosecutor­s said he knows many things about the defendant that he learned as Durst’s friend, not as his lawyer. The judge ultimately ruled that Altman did have to take the stand, but said that his lawyers could object to individual questions.

Defense attorneys opted not to ask Altman any questions on cross-examinatio­n.

Durst will return to court Sept. 20, when attorneys will discuss whether they will be prepared for a preliminar­y hearing scheduled for Oct. 16. The judge said the timetable will be somewhat flexible, as several Houstonbas­ed members of Durst’s legal team either had to evacuate their homes or had office damage caused by Hurricane Harvey.

 ?? Jae C. Hong Associated Press ?? ROBERT DURST, shown in court in December, is unlikely to go on trial for murder until at least 2018.
Jae C. Hong Associated Press ROBERT DURST, shown in court in December, is unlikely to go on trial for murder until at least 2018.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States