Los Angeles Times

Estee Lauder is accused of bias against new dads

Mothers get six weeks of paid leave, but fathers get only two weeks, U.S. suit says.

- associated press Times staff writer James F. Peltz contribute­d to this report.

The federal agency whose job is to stop workplace discrimina­tion has sued Estee Lauder Cos., alleging that new fathers at the beauty products maker get lesser benefits than their female colleagues.

The Equal Employment Opportunit­y Commission said in a lawsuit filed Wednesday in Philadelph­ia that Estee Lauder allows new fathers to take only two weeks of paid leave, but lets new mothers take six weeks. It also notes that new mothers are entitled to a “transition back to work” benefit that includes flexible schedules, working from home and shorter work weeks, but new fathers are not.

The New York City company didn’t immediatel­y return a message Thursday seeking comment.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Christophe­r Sullivan, an Estee Lauder stockperso­n in a Delaware store.

The lawsuit says that on June 15, 2015, Sullivan informed the company of the birth of his child and his intention to take primary caregiver leave for six weeks under Estee Lauder’s policy.

He was informed that as the biological father, he was entitled only to secondary caregiver leave and would receive two weeks off.

“It is wonderful when employers provide paid parental leave and flexible work arrangemen­ts, but federal law requires equal pay, including benefits, for equal work, and that applies to men as well as women,” said Mindy Weinstein, the acting director at the commission’s Washington field office.

The suit seeks a jury trial and relief for men who work at the company who the EEOC says were denied equal parental leave benefits because of their sex.

The lawsuit comes the same week the White House halted an Obama administra­tion rule that would have required businesses to report worker pay data by gender, race and ethnicity in hopes of narrowing wage gaps among workers.

But the Trump administra­tion contended that the data collection would be too burdensome for firms and questioned how effective the data might be in fighting wage discrimina­tion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States