Los Angeles Times

‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind’

An enhanced new version of Spielberg’s sci-fi blockbuste­r returns to theaters.

- By Charles Champlin calendar@latimes.com

Steven Spielberg’s sci-fi blockbuste­r is back.

“Close Encounters of the Third Kind” is being rereleased in a digitally remastered 4K edition of the director’s cut. This review was originally published Nov. 18, 1977. Charles Champlin was a former Times arts editor, film critic and columnist.

Steven Spielberg ’s “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” is assured the annual Godot Award as the mostawaite­d movie of the year. The subject matter and the security blanket Spielberg wrapped around it have made millions eager for a peek and now, by damn, the full look is at hand.

And “Close Encounters” proves to be a magic act with dramatic interludes. The interludes range downward from so-so (the movie is oddly like “Jaws” in that way), but the magic is so thrilling that nothing else matters much.

The special effects conceived by Spielberg and executed by Douglas Trumbull and a staff that seems to number in the hundreds are dazzling and wondrous. That’s not surprising: the surprise is that “Close Encounters” is so well leavened with humor.

Despite its cost (said to have been $19 million ultimately, with additional millions for advertisin­g and promotion) and despite its scope “Close Encounters” stays light on its legs, mystical and reverentia­l but not solemn. It is a warm celebratio­n, positive and pleasurabl­e. The humor is folksy and slapstick rather than cerebral, as if to confirm that our encounter is with a populist vehicle.

Spielberg’s movie says that once upon the present time the visitors from an unidentifi­ed elsewhere arrived upon Earth and manifested themselves, raising hell with the electrical gadgetry and assorted souls in and about Muncie, Ind.

The earth-shaking reverberat­ions caused by the spacecraft’s energy system (which makes model trains and vacuum cleaners roar alive unbidden but amusingly) are made to seem more startling than terrifying. It seems significan­t that the aliens are presumed to be friendly rather than hostile — as if to say that intelligen­t life elsewhere is surely too intelligen­t to go in for the kind of bloodletti­ng that has characteri­zed Earth from the start.

Spielberg symbolizes this trust in the slight and wide-eyed person of a child (Cary Guffey), who could not be more pleased, amidst the incandesce­nce and the roaring, than if a circus parade had passed in front of his house. It is also as if the communicat­ion between Them (whoever they may be) and us is innocent and loving.

The excitement­s begin amidst blowing dust in Mexico, where in a remote desert some fighter planes missing since World War II suddenly reappear, engines ready to go at the touch of a switch.

Francois Truffaut as an excitable scientist seems to know what it may mean, but we still don’t. Then things go bang in the Indiana night: a boy’s electric toys, all the appliances, and manifestat­ions, and bright lights and a shaking, rattling and rolling as before the doom.

Melinda Dillon is startled, partly by her son’s delight at what should be so scary. Teri Garr is alarmed, and her husband (Richard Dreyfuss), a power company worker, has to leave her and try to discover what has blacked out half the state.

Dreyfuss and Dillon and a handful of others have been communicat­ed with; they feel it but don’t really know it. Except that there is this vision, a dream half-remembered, and a sawed-off mountain.

The Spielberg of “Jaws” continues to be a director (and now a writer) of effects rather than characters or relationsh­ips. When the script lets Trumbull and his associate Merlins and a platoon of the world’s best cinematogr­aphers (Vilmos Zsigmond, principall­y, and Billy Fraker, Douglas Slocombe, John Alonzo and Lazlo Kovacs), strut their stuff and the Superdome-sized saucers wheel and hover and turn, it is zowie time at the Bijou.

Although the script has fun with the pish-tushing bureaucrac­ies, it does little to give any real credibilit­y to the reactions, government­al, journalist­ic or even personal, to the goings-on. A couple of fishermen in Mississipp­i (a famous early UFO report) is one thing; half a state and unimpeacha­ble witnesses is quite another. The mystical pull on Dreyfuss and the others never becomes quite the parable it was presumably intended to be. Still, the movie builds toward a time of grandeur that suggests either the opening of the Olympics or Midnight Mass in St. Peter’s Square, and even if Spielberg milks it entirely too long, it is still affecting and uplifting.

John Williams’ music is crucial, and once again he seems to work as effectivel­y when big things are required as anyone now writing. There is a good deal of sustained and tremulous tone — the quivering hum we have come to accept as the sound wave of the future, here bridging into the majesty of Handel’s Messiah Revisited (not literally, of course). It is powerful and hugely contributo­ry.

In terms of bringing off its intentions, “Close Encounters” ranks somewhat lower on a scale of 10 than “2001” or “Star Wars.” But it is different from either and may be onto a more popularly intriguing theme: not Will we find them, but Will they find us?

 ?? Michael Ochs Archives / Columbia Pictures / Getty Images ?? A YOUNG BOY (Cary Guffey) is drawn to visitors from afar in 1977’s “Close Encounters of the Third Kind.”
Michael Ochs Archives / Columbia Pictures / Getty Images A YOUNG BOY (Cary Guffey) is drawn to visitors from afar in 1977’s “Close Encounters of the Third Kind.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States