A scholar and the Israel debate

Re “An Israel litmus test,” Opinion, Sept. 8

Normally, I would agree that political orientation should not affect whom to choose to lead a museum. But these are different times.

This year has seen academic institutions indulge in historical revision of sorts. Respected Ivy League universities change the names of buildings because administrations critique the behavior of a building’s namesake based on today’s standards and not those of the age in which the person lived. As a consequence, the good done that prompted the naming of the building gets erased.

Given that David N. Myers, the new president of the Center for Jewish History in New York, advised J Street (hardly a “center-left group”), I wonder how he would have his museum portray exhibits related to Israel. Those who oppose his selection have valid concerns. Emanuel R. Baker Los Angeles

I have known Myers for more than a dozen years. From the very many discussions and writings that I am aware of, he is a smart, well-informed and articulate proponent of a peaceful solution to the IsraeliPalestinian conflict.

Despite the opinions of his detractors, Myers’ opinions have always been well balanced and practical. If suggesting that the conflict can be resolved while maintaining democratic and humanitarian values is radical, Myers is indeed guilty. Michael Telerant Los Angeles