Los Angeles Times

Teacher prevails in ‘gun’ dispute

- By Howard Blume howard.blume @latimes.com

Three days of lost pay may not seem like much, not worth arguing over for more than three years. But when an arbitratio­n panel ruled last month that biology teacher Greg Schiller should get that money back, he and his many supporters saw a much greater victory.

They view the resolution in Schiller’s favor as overdue vindicatio­n for an instructor who just wanted to teach science, but whose efforts fell victim to ignorance, overreacti­on and bureaucrat­ic one-size-fits-all, by-therules stubbornne­ss.

Schiller’s problems at the Cortines School of Visual and Performing Arts began in early 2014, when L.A. Unified declared that two student projects he’d been supervisin­g were guns.

One was a tube that could propel an object using air pressure. The other was an electromag­netic coil that could speed an object out of a tube.

Schiller had volunteere­d to help the students with their entries for science contests.

He hadn’t been shown the final version of the air pressure tube when Assistant Principal Kenneth Martinez saw it on display in the cafeteria with the caption: “Can You Make a Gun Out of PVC?” He reported that project to higher-ups. A dean reported the other one. Both were confiscate­d.

The district — which has a zero-tolerance weapons policy — promptly removed Schiller from the classroom, suspended him with pay and launched what would turn out to be a lengthy investigat­ion. He was out for two months, during which time the fencing team he coached had to forfeit its season. Students also complained about the quality of the substitute teachers.

Meanwhile, students and parents rallied around Schiller. They pointed out that the air pressure project wasn’t attached to any source of air pressure — and that at a White House science fair, a more powerful version could propel a marshmallo­w 175 feet. A Times editorial accused the district of “harmful overreacti­on.”

After two months, the district let Schiller return to the school on the edge of downtown. At the time, it was almost unheard of for a teacher accused of anything to be allowed to teach while an investigat­ion proceeded. The school system was jumpy in the aftermath of a 2012 teacher abuse scandal at Miramonte Elementary.

Schiller’s case influenced the district to change its procedures and let a teacher remain in class during an inquiry if there was no possibilit­y of student harm or discomfort.

Ultimately, Schiller was docked the three days’ pay and received a permanent reprimand in his personnel file. Schiller challenged the penalty, and the arbitratio­n went on for years.

The district accused Schiller of allowing students to make guns and said he supervised them so poorly that one student could have caused serious injury when he took his finished weapon to another teacher’s classroom and fired it in a display. Officials said Schiller also lied about his role in the projects.

The arbitratio­n panel that was convened, per the labor contract, consisted of a person chosen by the teachers union, another by the district and a third nonaligned individual who headed the panel. They unanimousl­y took issue with the district’s account.

They questioned the descriptio­n of the two objects as guns.

The air pressure device lacked the compressed air needed to work. The other project’s propulsion system was made up of a capacitor from a disposable camera, a AA battery and a tube about the size of a pen. When the student demonstrat­ed it, in the incident the district said could have caused serious injury, a steel marble traveled about six inches in the air.

“While the device created by these two students would meet the strict definition of a weapon as defined by the zero tolerance policy, and while [the] employer’s policy pertaining to weapons on any of its premises is reasonable,” the arbitrator­s wrote, “strict applicatio­n without thought can potentiall­y stifle or impede learning.”

The panel also did not accept the district’s contention that Schiller lied, though arbitrator­s said he could have supervised the students more closely.

One of those students, Asa Ferguson — now at Deep Springs College near Bishop — whose parents, Rogan and Susan Ferguson, are L.A. Unified teachers, attended a party for Schiller last weekend.

“This has been a weight that we’ve been carrying as well,” Rogan Ferguson said. “We’ve always known that Greg was innocent. This is an incredible day for our family, a relief.”

The arbitratio­n panel ordered that its ruling be attached as an amendment to the original “Notice of Unsatisfac­tory Act” that the district had placed in Schiller’s file.

The district declined to comment on the ruling. Martinez has since become the principal at Cortines, where Schiller continues to teach and coach fencing.

Schiller said, “This whole issue could’ve been resolved … years ago with minimal stress, minimal loss of classroom instructio­n, and minimal cost.”

 ?? Anne Cusack Los Angeles Times ?? ASA FERGUSON, foregound, with parents Rogan and Susan Ferguson. When Asa was a Cortines student, L.A. Unified deemed his science project a gun.
Anne Cusack Los Angeles Times ASA FERGUSON, foregound, with parents Rogan and Susan Ferguson. When Asa was a Cortines student, L.A. Unified deemed his science project a gun.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States