Los Angeles Times

Congress must weigh in on Yemen

The U.S. has taken sides in a catastroph­ic conflict with no national debate.

- Daniel DePetris is a fellow at the Defense Priorities think tank. By Daniel DePetris

The ongoing civil war in Yemen was instigated by the region’s major powers, with Iran on one side and a Saudi Arabia-led coalition of Persian Gulf states on the other. The fighting — especially airstrikes by Saudi and United Arab Emirates pilots — has devastated Yemen, one of the Arab world’s poorest nations. It has created what three U.N. agencies call “the world’s largest humanitari­an crisis”: Sixty percent of the Yemeni population is “food insecure”; 700,000 have been infected with cholera, a deadly disease spread by a lack of clean water and sanitation.

There are plenty of manmade catastroph­es around the world today, but the conflict in Yemen is unique because the United States is not a bystander or neutral arbiter. We have gone along for the ride, providing indirect military assistance on the Saudi side.

Without congressio­nal authorizat­ion — and without a peep from the leaders of either party — the Obama and Trump administra­tions made the U.S. a participan­t. Now a bipartisan group of House members is invoking the War Powers Act of 1973 and demanding that Congress either support our involvemen­t in Yemen or direct the president to end it.

Since March 2015, when the Saudi coalition began bombing Houthi rebels in support of the internatio­nally recognized Yemeni government, the U.S. Air Force has assisted — enabled — Riyadh and its allies in the air campaign. Americans aren’t pulling triggers, but we are integral protagonis­ts in the fight.

Air Force intelligen­ce identifies Houthi targets to hit and civilian facilities to avoid. At the U.N., in the Security Council and the Human Rights Council, Washington has protected Riyadh from censure, watering down resolution­s and preventing war crimes inquiries. Most important, throughout the war, Saudi and Emirati jets have used U.S. midair refueling capabiliti­es to keep up the pace of operations without having to return to a base.

According to Pentagon statistics, the Air Force has refueled Saudi aircraft more than 9,000 times. American pilots don’t have to traverse Yemeni airspace to reach coalition planes, which keeps us technicall­y out of the fighting, but without this U.S. help, it is unlikely the Saudi side could maintain its participat­ion in what regional analysts already call a quagmire.

Congress has had no say in U.S. involvemen­t in the war. Out of cowardice, political concerns, general disinteres­t in Yemen or (unjustifie­d) allegiance to Saudi Arabia, lawmakers have not debated — let alone voted on — whether U.S. national security interests are served by picking winners and losers in a proxy contest between rival Mideast factions. U.S. participat­ion has been left to the president to decide, as if Congress had no responsibi­lity in scrutinizi­ng American foreign policy.

This is not what the Founders envisioned. The Constituti­on places no higher priority on the legislativ­e branch than determinin­g when the United States will send its servicemen and women into war. In this case, long before the military aid was offered, the American people, through their elected representa­tives, should have had a national debate about what, if any, U.S. objectives would be served by entering the Yemen conflict, what military support would be required, whether diplomatic conditions should be attached to military action and how aiding Riyadh’s bombing campaign could affect our other interests in the region. (In fact, the destructio­n of Yemen has strengthen­ed Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and worked against our counterter­rorism operations there.)

On Sept. 27, Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Torrance), Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Mark Pocan (DWis.) and Walter Jones (R-N.C.) stepped in to fill the void in congressio­nal leadership. They introduced a concurrent resolution under the the War Powers Act, demanding an end to U.S. involvemen­t in the Yemen civil war in 30 days unless Congress votes otherwise. Under provisions in the act, such a resolution supposedly cannot be stalled or buried in committee. If the House Foreign Affairs Committee does not move the resolution forward within 15 days — sometime this week — it can be brought to the floor for debate and a vote anyway.

Supporters and opponents of U.S. policy in Yemen should make their case to the American people through Congress, just as the founders intended and the Constituti­on requires. Lawmakers have the power to make that happen, but that power is meaningles­s if they refuse to use it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States