Los Angeles Times

Congress battles; wildfires worsen

Prevention funds go to firefighti­ng — and partisan battles prevent a fix

- By Evan Halper evan.halper@latimes.com

As with so much else on Capitol Hill, politics and ideology have left a serious problem to fester and grow.

WASHINGTON — The monstrous flames ripping through Northern California in recent days have burned communitie­s to the ground, killed dozens of people caught in their path and wreaked havoc on a regional economy.

By almost any metric, that would be defined as a natural disaster — except the one used by Congress to draw up the federal budget.

The absurd way in which Washington pays to put out wildfires throughout the West is making a dangerous situation even more so. It’s a rare point of bipartisan agreement in Congress that a fix is urgently needed, particular­ly as fires grow in duration and intensity.

But as with so much else on Capitol Hill, politics and ideology have left a serious problem to fester and grow, as lawmakers forsake a simple solution and hold the issue hostage to more complicate­d battles. Partisan feuds over climate change, clear-cut logging and bedrock federal environmen­tal policies are underminin­g efforts to confront the rapidly swelling fire money dilemma.

The root problem: The U.S. Forest Service is strapped for cash. Its firefighti­ng budget amounts to a fraction of what it actually costs to fight fires. Not sending firefighte­rs is hardly an option. Even in the wine country blazes, which are not on federal land, the service has sent 1,500 firefighte­rs to help out the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, along with dozens of fire engines, air tankers, helicopter­s and water scoopers.

The Forest Service has no choice but to pay for the assistance by raiding funds from other programs in its budget — many of them oriented toward preventing the very fires it is fighting. Prevention efforts are put aside as dollars are funneled toward putting out flames.

To put it in perspectiv­e: About 56% of the agency’s budget now gets consumed fighting fires. In 1995, not even a sixth of its budget was spent there. That is a lot of fire prevention work going undone.

“We have a dangerous, worsening cycle,” Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said on the Senate floor just before California’s wine country became an inferno. “Shoddy budgeting today leads to bigger fires tomorrow, and it needs to stop .... This battle has gone on for years.”

This is not the way Washington confronts other disasters. Hurricane, tornado and earthquake assistance and relief come from emergency funds that can be accessed without robbing other programs.

State officials are growing increasing­ly anxious that wildfires are treated differentl­y. The bipartisan Western Governors’ Assn. warned congressio­nal leaders in November that the financial shell game had “allowed severe wildfires to burn through crippling amounts of the very funds that should instead be used to prevent and reduce wildfire impacts, costs, and safety risks to firefighte­rs and the public.”

Cal Fire just last week expressed concern about the reliabilit­y of federal help in the future if the financial chaos persists. Within four years, more than two-thirds of the Forest Service budget will be consumed by firefighti­ng costs if Congress does not act.

But Congress can’t seem to figure out how, amid feuding about the science and economics of wildfires. Many Republican­s are demanding that any solution involve intensifyi­ng the amount of logging on public land, allowing clear-cuts as large as 10 or 15 square miles in federal forests, and weakening the National Environmen­tal Policy Act, the 1969 landmark law that drives much of federal conservati­on policy.

The rollbacks are nonstarter­s for Democrats, who brandish research findings that climate change — not too little commercial logging — is a major driver of the intensifyi­ng fires.

Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris of California last week sent Trump a letter as fires raged in Northern California imploring him to support fixing the Forest Service money problem in a stand-alone measure, and then deal with the broader disputes over forestry management.

The White House has gone in the other direction. Its budget director, Mick Mulvaney, wrote in a letter to congressio­nal leaders that “active forest management and other reforms must be part of the solution to curb the cost and destructio­n of wildfires.” The posture has emboldened Republican­s in their push for more logging.

Among them is Rep. Tom McClintock of Elk Grove, Calif., who in a floor speech this month mocked the science Democrats point to showing climate change is a big factor in the worsening wildfires.

One such study, published in the Proceeding­s of the National Academy of Sciences last year, found that climate-change-induced hotter, drier weather in the West has doubled the amount of forestland hit by wildfires since 1984.

McClintock made clear he doesn’t buy it. He instead blamed the National Environmen­tal Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act. Their “endlessly timeconsum­ing and cost-prohibitiv­e restrictio­ns,” he said, have driven away the timber companies that had previously helped clear the driest and most-stressed wood from forests.

“Well, after 45 years of experience with these environmen­tal laws — all passed with the promise that they would improve our forest environmen­t — I think we are entitled to ask: How’s the forest environmen­t doing?” McClintock said. “All around us, the answer is damning. These laws have not only failed to improve our forest environmen­t, but they are literally killing our forests.”

Democrats and environmen­talists say the House measure that McClintock and other Republican­s favor to fix the funding problem is less about fighting fires than creating a big giveaway for logging interests.

“We don’t think completely eliminatin­g environmen­tal safeguards will solve the problem or make us safer,” said Megan Birzell, national forests campaign manager at the Wilderness Society. “We don’t need 10,000-acre clear-cuts in the back country to solve this.”

The continued fight, for now, leaves the Forest Service in the lurch as resources from its prevention programs are drained to fight increasing­ly bigger and hotter fires.

Wyden called it “the longest-running battle since the Trojan War.”

“The West,” he said, “cannot wait any longer for Congress to break this dangerous cycle that defies common sense, shortchang­es wildfire prevention, and does it year after year.”

 ?? Marcus Yam Los Angeles Times ?? FIREFIGHTE­RS in Napa County last week. Democrats blame climate change for the increase in wildfires; Republican­s say the problem is a decline in logging.
Marcus Yam Los Angeles Times FIREFIGHTE­RS in Napa County last week. Democrats blame climate change for the increase in wildfires; Republican­s say the problem is a decline in logging.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States