Los Angeles Times

New monuments to Confederac­y rise as others fall

- By Jenny Jarvie

ORANGE, Texas — Annette Pernell, a council member in this Texas town, was aghast when she heard about plans to construct a Confederat­e memorial that would be visible from the interstate and loom over Martin Luther King Jr. Drive.

But there was nothing she or anybody else could do about it. The land is private.

And so the Confederat­e Memorial of the Wind slowly went up on a grassy halfacre. A total of 13 concrete columns — one for each Confederat­e state — rise from a circular concrete pedestal. Eventually it will be surrounded by as many as 40 poles topped with Civil War battle flags.

“It’s as if we’ve gone backwards,” said Pernell, who is 54 and black. “I didn’t think, at this age, I would see what I’m seeing now. A Confederat­e memorial is a slap in the face of all Americans, not just African Americans.”

More than 150 years after Robert E. Lee’s surrender at Appomattox, local officials across the Deep South are removing contentiou­s Confederat­e monuments from prominent perches in busy town squares and government buildings. In August, violence at a rally of white nationalis­ts seeking to preserve a statue of Lee in Charlottes­ville, Va. — and comments by President Trump opposing its removal — brought renewed national attention to the issue.

Less publicized has been the quiet rise of a new generation of Confederat­e markers — on private land, in cemeteries, on historic battlefiel­ds.

In South Carolina last month, a granite monument dedicated to the “immortal spirit of the Confederat­e cause” was unveiled on a spot where Civil War enthu-

siasts gather each year to reenact the Battle of Aiken.

In Alabama in August, a gray stone memorial was dedicated in a private Crenshaw County park to unknown Confederat­e soldiers.

In Georgia last year, a black marble obelisk was erected on public land in the mountain town of Dahlonega in memory of the county’s nearly 1,200 Confederat­e veterans.

In all, more than 30 monuments and symbols to the Confederac­y have been dedicated or rededicate­d since 2000, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. A historian at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, W. Fitzhugh Brundage, conducted an inventory of his own state and found that 20 monuments had gone up there over that time — the most since the early 20th century.

The people funding the monuments — often the great-great-grandchild­ren of Confederat­e soldiers — say they simply want to remember their loved ones and ensure their legacies live on. More controvers­ially, many also promote a revisionis­t history in which slavery was not a major cause of the war.

“We just want to honor our ancestors,” said Hank Van Slyke, a 62-year-old engineerin­g specialist and commander of a local Sons of Confederat­e Veterans brigade that put up the monument in Orange. The group is an associatio­n of male descendant­s of Confederat­e soldiers, and was formed in 1896 to hail the “hallowed memories of brave men” and “record of the services of every Southern Soldier.”

“Throughout history, whoever wins the war and conquers the nation, they get to write the history books,” he said. “We’ve always studied that we had a good cause and our ancestors fought for what they thought was right.”

While most historians agree that the root cause of the Civil War was slavery, a significan­t number of Americans, particular­ly in the South, have been taught the war was about states’ rights in general. Six years ago, a Pew Research Center survey found that 48% of Americans said states’ rights were the reason for the war, while 38% cited slavery.

The debate is particular­ly charged in Texas, where the State Board of Education in 2010 adopted new academic standards listing slavery as third among the causes of the war, after sectionali­sm and states’ rights.

“There’s a kind of historical symmetry, in that many of these men now fighting the battle to defend the Lost Cause are predispose­d to see themselves as under threat,” Brundage said.

The new monuments tend to be more modest than older ones. At the turn of the 20th century, when Confederat­e organizati­ons enjoyed enormous cultural prestige in the South, large bronze and marble monuments were erected in conspicuou­s public spaces and etched with politicall­y charged plaques.

Now, Brundage said, they often focus less on defending the Confederac­y and more on memorializ­ing unknown soldiers or listing those who died.

Even in its unfinished state, the new Confederat­e memorial in Orange has stirred more public controvers­y than most new ones.

“We know this makes our town look bad,” said John “Jack” Smith, the city attorney for Orange, a town of 19,000 near the Louisiana state line whose motto is “Small town charm, world class culture.”

Smith said the monument didn’t reflect the values of Orange residents, and he slammed the Sons of Confederat­e Veterans as a “racist hate group.”

“We’re very concerned that this could send the wrong signal about Orange as people drive down the highway,” he said. “But what can we do about it? It’s a matter of free speech. We cannot stop them from building the thing on private land.”

Just over a third of Orange residents are black — a greater share than in any other town in the predominan­tly white county, which has long grappled with racism. In the 1990s, members of the Ku Klux Klan protesting federal attempts to integrate public housing held marches in the nearby city of Vidor, which was notorious as a “sundown town” because African Americans were not safe

 ?? Brynn Anderson Associated Press ?? A CIVIL WAR reenactor kneels in August before a new monument in Brantley, Ala. — one of many Confederat­e memorials erected in recent years. The monuments’ supporters often say the war was not over slavery, as most historians maintain, but over states’...
Brynn Anderson Associated Press A CIVIL WAR reenactor kneels in August before a new monument in Brantley, Ala. — one of many Confederat­e memorials erected in recent years. The monuments’ supporters often say the war was not over slavery, as most historians maintain, but over states’...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States