Los Angeles Times

Workers split on diversity

- By Jena McGregor McGregor writes a column on leadership for the Washington Post.

Corporate executives like to say gender diversity is one of their top priorities. They mount publicity campaigns, tout their equal pay measures and start up women’s networks to help promote female leaders.

But the view of those agendas — and companies’ success at achieving them — is starkly different among male versus female employees, according to a recent survey.

The survey, by consulting giant McKinsey and the Sheryl Sandberg-funded women’s organizati­on Lean In, shows a sharp divide between how men and women view their companies’ efforts at advancing women.

The annual report, which in 2017 surveyed more than 70,000 employees working at 76 companies, shows that 63% of men said their company is doing what it takes to improve gender diversity, while 49% of women said the same.

Fifty-five percent of men said disrespect­ful behavior in their workplaces is addressed quickly, while 34% of women said the same. Half of men said managers consider diverse candidates for open jobs, compared with just 35% of women.

Although it may not be surprising that men and women have different opinions about gender diversity efforts in the workplace, the report also revealed conflictin­g views on what might be “enough” when it comes to the gender makeup of their companies. For instance, in companies where just 1 in 10 senior leaders is female, nearly 50% of men said women were “well represente­d” in the senior ranks, while only one-third of women — somewhat remarkably — said the same.

“It really speaks to a perception mismatch,” said Lareina Yee, a senior partner at McKinsey. “I think what this says is that when you see almost no women — and then when you see 1 out of 10 and you think they’re well represente­d — our mind is taking a bit of a shortcut. It’s settling into the status quo.”

The report shows a disconnect similar to what previous reports have found about how important men and women think gender diversity is.

Last year, a survey by PwC of more than 800 corporate directors found that only about a quarter of the men who responded thought gender diversity on the corporate board improved a company’s performanc­e, while 89% of female directors did. Only 38% of the men said diversity improved a board’s effectiven­ess, compared with 92% of the women.

The survey also found a noticeable difference between the career aspiration­s of women of color and white women, despite a perceived lack of encouragem­ent and help by their managers. Some 44% of black women said they want to be a top executive at their company, compared with just 33% of white women. Yet just 28% of black women, the survey found, said they felt their managers defended them or their work, compared with 40% of white women and 43% of white men.

“These are not employees at large,” Yee said. “These are the people you have already hired, you’ve already screened — you’re investing in them .... Presumably you’d like to see them succeed.”

McKinsey’s report shows that at every rank the percentage of women holding jobs is either flat or up just 1 percentage point since last year, with the number of women at the senior vice president level 3 percentage points lower than in 2016.

The survey points to employees’ and their managers’ failure to grasp the magnitude of the problem as one reason for the glacial progress.

“I don’t think there’s any [malicious] intent; it’s a pure blind spot,” Yee said. In some companies, after decades of there being no women at the top, seeing even one can look like headway.

“If you perceive that it’s better than it actually is, then how urgent you feel it is to change is likely diminished,” she said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States