Los Angeles Times

Is he right for the O.C.?

Rep. Dana Rohrabache­r is a Kremlin apologist and one of President Trump’s most stalwart allies.

- By Conor Friedersdo­rf andidate Trump Conor Friedersdo­rf isa contributi­ng writer to Opinion, a staff writer at the Atlantic and founding editor of the Best of Journalism, a newsletter that curates exceptiona­l nonfiction.

Crejected the sunny, libertaria­n-inflected conservati­sm of Ronald Reagan and steered the Republican Party toward a vulgar, anti-immigrant, anti-freemarket populism. The approach helped get him into the White House. But it was a poor fit for the historic Republican stronghold of Orange County: A prosperous, ethnically diverse area where crime is low and the gains from foreign trade are many. Come election day, Trump became the first Republican presidenti­al candidate to lose Orange County in 80 years.

The outcome didn’t surprise me, and not just because the county’s demographi­cs are changing. In Orange County’s 48th Congressio­nal District, where I grew up, restaurant patrons wear flip-flops to dinner. Bars play surf videos as often as football. It is high praise to be described as “laid-back.” Little wonder that it rejected a boorish avatar of outer-borough braggadoci­o. Yet Costa Mesa, Newport Beach and surroundin­g cities in the 48th did reelect longtime GOP Congressma­n Dana Rohrabache­r, who has become one of President Trump’s most stalwart allies. How long can the 30-year veteran of Washington, D.C., last? Can he win reelection in 2018?

Democrats are aggressive­ly targeting his seat in their effort to retake control of the House of Representa­tives. Possible Democratic opponents include a stem cell scientist, a real estate entreprene­ur and a Nestle executive. The longtime incumbent even faces at least two challenger­s from his own party. Stelian Onufrei, who owns a constructi­on business, said he would contribute $500,000 to self-fund his challenge. Writer Paul Martin self-describes as a “Reagan Republican” and is critical of the Trump administra­tion.

The Cook Political Report says the perenniall­y “safe” seat is now “a toss-up.”

Rohrabache­r’s opponents see his behavior toward Russia as a vulnerabil­ity. A longtime proponent of closer ties with Moscow, Rohrabache­r has been an occasional apologist for Russian President Vladamir Putin’s imperial foreign policy and has cultivated ties with Kremlin-connected Russians. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfiel­d) once declared in a private meeting of GOP officials: “There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabache­r and Trump.” McCarthy later insisted he was joking.

The insinuatio­ns may be unfair. Hard evidence of wrongdoing with regard to Russia is thin, and Washington has a sordid history of lashing out at dissenters from establishm­ent foreign policy.

That’s why the more potent critique would focus on Rohrabache­r’s priorities. Whatever one thinks of Russia, it’s hard to believe that’s where the residents of Seal Beach or Laguna Niguel want their representa­tive focusing his time, energy and public statements. These are communitie­s where housing costs are high, traffic is increasing­ly gridlocked, infrastruc­ture improvemen­ts are lagging and homelessne­ss is more widespread than ever in recent memory. And, of all things, Rohrabache­r is trying to set up a meeting with President Trump about Julian Assange, the Wikileaks founder, whom he traveled abroad to meet on his own dime. It’s as if he’s trying harder to help Fox News with its story lines than his constituen­ts with their reallife problems.

He hasn’t totally lost his libertaria­n streak. As I write, the lead video on Rohrabache­r’s website features him speaking out against asset forfeiture on the House floor, and he favors medical marijuana. Normally I’d be loath to lose a congressma­n of that sort. But what’s the use of holding those sensible positions if he meanwhile works to empower an administra­tion that has loosened restrictio­ns on asset forfeiture and pushed a drug war approach to weed?

The contradict­ion seems lost on the incumbent.

“These people aren’t going to vote for Democrats,” Rohrabache­r told the Washington Post’s Dave Weigel last spring, dismissing the notion that he is vulnerable. “A lot of Republican women voted for Hillary. That is not going to translate into anything next year. Trump is a very boisterous guy, and that was a turnoff for some people, but these are Reagan-type conservati­ves.”

But that’s the thing: Dana Rohrabache­r isn’t a Reagan-type conservati­ve anymore. Trumpism is a repudiatio­n of Reaganism; by embracing it, Rohrabache­r has betrayed his political heritage.

Allying with Trump will certainly cost the incumbent among Democrats, Latinos, Asian Americans and other growing Orange County demographi­c groups that Trump has so alienated. Insofar as Reaganism really lives on in the 48th, its adherents will oppose this incumbent, too. Unprincipl­ed populists are always anathema to principled conservati­ves, and most of all when the populism isn’t even in service of constituen­t interests.

 ?? Bill Clark CQ-Roll Call,Inc. ?? DANA ROHRABACHE­R is drawing challenger­s for his seat from Democrats and Republican­s.
Bill Clark CQ-Roll Call,Inc. DANA ROHRABACHE­R is drawing challenger­s for his seat from Democrats and Republican­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States