Los Angeles Times

Don’t hike national park fees

- Ur national parks

Oface two persistent problems: Chronic underfundi­ng that has led to a nearly $12-billion backlog in maintenanc­e, and massive crowds during peak seasons at the most popular destinatio­ns. Congress created much of the backlog problem by failing to properly budget for upkeep, which it needs to address. But the parks also are victims of their own success — visitors to Yosemite National Park alone surged from 3.9 million in 2010 to 5 million last year.

The Trump administra­tion wants to address both problems by raising the entry fee during the peak season at 17 top parks to $70 per vehicle, more than doubling the current fee (the rate would double for motorcycle­s and walk-ins as well). But such “surge pricing” effectivel­y closes the door to certain lower-income families, to the advantage of wealthier ones. That is fundamenta­lly unfair.

There are better ways of addressing overcrowdi­ng than pricing out lower-income families. To alleviate the press of cars, the government could bar private vehicles during peak seasons and ferry people around on shuttles (ideally, buses that do not emit greenhouse gases). It could limit the number of vehicles allowed and award entry passes by lottery to reduce the volume of visitors. Rangers recommende­d last summer that Zion National Park adopt a reservatio­n system for entry, much as it and other parks already use for controllin­g access to campsites, though it doesn’t appear that the suggestion went anywhere. So there are other solutions.

The priorities here should be maintainin­g the parks (which Congress must fund), minimizing damage from overuse, and ensuring the parks are as accessible as possible to all without placing too high a financial burden on those who choose to visit them. The administra­tion is right to recognize the maintenanc­e backlog and overcrowdi­ng as problems, but it needs to find other solutions. The parks are a shared national treasure, and just as we should all be able to share equally in the benefits they bring, so too should we share the cost of maintainin­g them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States