Los Angeles Times

Twitter bans ads from two Russian news outlets

Firm cites U.S. finding that Russia Today and Sputnik tried to sway presidenti­al election.

- By Ben Muessig

Twitter Inc. said Thursday that it will no longer accept advertisin­g from Sputnik and Russia Today, pointing to the U.S. intelligen­ce community’s conclusion that the two Kremlinfun­ded news organizati­ons were part of a Russian government operation to influence the 2016 U.S. presidenti­al election.

Also Thursday, Twitter posted third-quarter earnings, which caused its stock to surge more than 18%.

State-sponsored attempts to “interfere with and disrupt” the election are “not something we want on Twitter,” the San Francisco social media company said on its blog.

Twitter said it will donate the $1.9 million in advertisin­g revenue it has obtained since 2011 from Russia Today to outside research about Twitter’s use in “civic engagement and elections.”

Sputnik and Russia Today, also known as RT, won’t lose their ability to post to Twitter, so they can still use it to circulate articles, videos and opinion pieces.

Twitter’s move comes as social media platforms face increased scrutiny for their failure to stop bots, foreign government­s and anonymous ads from spreading misinforma­tion and propaganda. Twitter and Facebook have both pledged to increase transparen­cy surroundin­g political ads.

Sputnik and Russia Today face pressure to register in the U.S. as foreign agents. Both say they are legitimate news-gathering organizati­ons, and both fired back at Twitter on Thursday.

Sputnik published an article in which Editor in Chief Margarita Simonyan called Twitter’s decision “regrettabl­e.” The article also quoted Russian President Vladimir Putin as saying his government would react to U.S. restrictio­ns on Russian media “swiftly and symmetrica­lly.”

In a post published Thursday, Russia Today Deputy Editor in Chief Kirill Karnovich-Valua said the outlet “never pursued an agenda of influencin­g the U.S. election through any platforms, including Twitter.” The article goes on to chronicle what it describes as Twitter’s attempts to encourage Russia Today to commit to a major advertisin­g initiative to help increase its U.S. audience during the 2016 election.

Twitter and Russia Today negotiated a media strategy that, according to the post, could have included giving the outlet early access to Twitter features, a “customized emojihasht­ag that would help RT stand out with special election coverage” and access to a “dedicated team of Twitter experts.” Russia Today says it rejected the tie-up because it was too expensive.

According to Twitter, Russia Today spent $274,100 in U.S.-based advertisin­g in 2016. Banning future ads from the company and Sputnik is unlikely to have a substantia­l financial impact on Twitter, which on Thursday reported third-quarter revenue of $589.6 million.

Twitter shares surged 18.5% on Thursday to $20.31, thanks to better-than-expected adjusted profit. Excluding one-time expenses, Twitter earned 10 cents a share, exceeding expectatio­ns by 2 cents.

Investors were not scared off by Twitter’s acknowledg­ment that since 2014 it has overestima­ted its monthly active users.

For each of the first two quarters of 2017, Twitter reduced its monthly active users by 2 million, adjusting the total to 327 million in the first quarter and 326 million in the second quarter. Twitter reversed that slide in its third quarter, reporting a total of 330 million.

ben.muessig@latimes.com

 ?? Justin Sullivan Getty Images ?? A SIGN at Twitter’s San Francisco headquarte­rs. Its stock soared 18.5% on strong third-quarter earnings.
Justin Sullivan Getty Images A SIGN at Twitter’s San Francisco headquarte­rs. Its stock soared 18.5% on strong third-quarter earnings.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States