Los Angeles Times

A look at conservati­ves’ mind- set

- David Lazarus‘ column runs Tuesdays and Fridays. He also can be seen daily on KTLA- TV Channel 5 and followed on Twitter @ Davidlaz. Send your tips or feedback to david. lazarus @ latimes. com.

university’s School of Psychology.

The Australian academics delved into complaint databases run by America’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, National Highway Traffic Safety Administra­tion and Federal Communicat­ions Commission. They inferred political leanings with county- level data from the 2012 U. S. presidenti­al election.

According to the paper, research on right- wing authoritar­ianism “shows that conservati­ves are more likely than liberals to yield to authority figures.”

At the same time, it says, conservati­ves are more willing to “justify potential failings of the existing social system and its institutio­ns.” Such system justificat­ion aims to legitimize the status quo, “seeing it as ‘ good, fair, natural, desirable and even inevitable.’”

This reflects conservati­ves’ belief that people should act “in ways to preserve either societal orderlines­s or its illusion.”

Note that last bit: societal orderlines­s or its illusion.

That goes a long way in explaining why so many Republican­s are willing to accept a party line that U. S. healthcare was much better before former President Obama tinkered with things, despite the Affordable Care Act’s obvious improvemen­ts.

“Obamacare is a total and complete disaster,” President Trump said at a campaign rally in February 2016.

He tweeted in March: “Obamacare is imploding. It is a disaster and 2017 will be the worst year yet, by far!”

In June he said that “we’re going to come out with a real bill, not Obamacare. And the results are going to be fantastic … and everybody is going to be happy.”

Republican­s never pas- sed such a bill. In October, Trump resorted to an executive order slashing subsidies for Obamacare, which most experts said would, yes, cause the program to implode.

Marketers have long understood that political ideology can shape consumer behavior.

“Messages appealing to individual­ity were more effective for liberal than conservati­ve consumers, while those appealing to a sense of duty to the group were more effective for conservati­ve than liberal consumers,” the Australian researcher­s found.

Obviously there are pitfalls in generalizi­ng people’s attitudes. So I contacted Joseph Antos, a resident scholar at the conservati­ve American Enterprise Institute who focuses on health policy.

He laughed when I described the Australian study’s conclusion­s and said it was “quite comical” that conservati­ves would be characteri­zed as having a knee- jerk aversion to change.

“Any normal human being is going to be con- cerned about changes where the impact is unclear,” Antos said. “Ordinary people don’t care about the Affordable Care Act. They care about their insurance and the cost of healthcare.”

Fair point. And, yes, premiums on the Obamacare exchanges have climbed much more than expected.

However, that’s not the disaster Trump makes it out to be. It’s primarily a factor of insurers failing to anticipate a surge in claims as millions obtained coverage, as well as a too- weak mandate that allowed healthier people to avoid buying insurance, thus raising costs for everyone else.

These are problems awaiting solutions from reasonable people capable of having grown- up discussion­s.

I find the Aussie researcher­s’ work reassuring. The dysfunctio­n of our pre- Obamacare health system was so profound that it’s hard to imagine anyone thinking those were the good old days.

Again: 50 million uninsured, coverage denied to people with preexistin­g conditions.

Not to mention annual and lifetime caps on insurance payouts, women paying more than men, premiums in the individual market rising by 10% annually, skimpy coverage for many plans, a very real fear of being uninsured if you lose your job.

If Republican­s can build on Obamacare’s advances, they should do so — there’s certainly room for improvemen­t. What we’ve gotten instead has been dozens of votes to repeal the law without a viable alternativ­e to replace it.

The party’s most recent healthcare bill, known as Graham- Cassidy, would have slashed Medicaid spending by $ 1 trillion, stripped insurance from millions of people and eliminated consumer protection­s for many with preexistin­g conditions.

“Graham- Cassidy Bill is GREAT!” Trump said in a tweet.

As the Aussie researcher­s found, conservati­ves “act in ways to preserve either societal orderlines­s or its illusion.”

That’s a polite way of saying these people are deluding themselves.

 ?? Joe Raedle Getty I mages ?? I N 2010, when the Affordable Care Act was signed into law, nearly 50 million Americans were uninsured. As of 2016, that number had dropped to about 29 million, according to the National Center for Health Statistics.
Joe Raedle Getty I mages I N 2010, when the Affordable Care Act was signed into law, nearly 50 million Americans were uninsured. As of 2016, that number had dropped to about 29 million, according to the National Center for Health Statistics.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States