Los Angeles Times

Proposal could keep oilfield from reopening

Councilman’s plan would affect South L.A. site blamed for a host of health issues.

- By Emily Alpert Reyes emily.alpert@latimes.com Twitter: @AlpertReye­s

Los Angeles City Councilman Gil Cedillo is pursuing an unusual plan that could thwart the reopening of a South L.A. oil drilling site that suspended operations after a public outcry over nosebleeds and other health problems reported by neighbors.

Cedillo, who represents the area near the Allenco Energy Inc. site, wants the city to use a rarely exercised power under its municipal code to cancel “oil drilling districts” where drilling is allowed.

In a proposal Tuesday, he called on city staffers to identify “inactive” drilling districts in the part of Los Angeles he represents, which stretches from Highland Park to Pico-Union, and report on the steps to terminate them.

“We want to protect our environmen­t and protect our residents,” Cedillo said. “And we want to be guided by the facts.”

Cedillo did not specifical­ly name Allenco in his proposal but said in an interview that the plan would affect the 23rd Street site.

If the drilling districts that include Allenco were terminated, “they wouldn’t be able to operate — because there would be no drilling district for them to operate in,” Cedillo spokesman Fredy Ceja said.

Allenco did not immediatel­y respond to an emailed request for comment Tuesday. A person who answered the phone at Allenco offices, who declined to provide his full name, said the company had no comment.

The proposal was applauded by environmen­tal and community activists who have called for the city to halt all drilling near homes and schools.

“After experienci­ng the harmful health impacts when the Allenco site was open ... our neighborho­od would be grateful to see the site permanentl­y shut down,” Nancy Halpern Ibrahim, executive director of Esperanza Community Housing, said in an email.

Before the drilling site shut down, neighbors had long complained of nosebleeds, dizziness and other health problems. After federal and local investigat­ions were launched and environmen­tal officials were sickened by fumes while visiting the site, the company agreed to suspend operations at the urging of then-Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.).

City Atty. Mike Feuer then sued the company and secured a court order that requires Allenco to follow stringent regulation­s if it wants to resume drilling. The company was also ordered to pay $1.25 million in penalties. It had already spent more than $1 million on other penalties and improvemen­ts to fix leaks, improve equipment and comply with state and federal laws.

“This has been, by far, the worst site in the city, as far as compliance issues and violations,” city petroleum administra­tor Uduak-Joe Ntuk said earlier this month.

Fearful that drilling could restart soon, community activists have called on the Roman Catholic Archdioces­e of Los Angeles, which owns the site, to terminate the Allenco lease and shut it down permanentl­y. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health has also urged the archdioces­e to reexamine the lease, saying the oil site had a “deleteriou­s effect” on community health.

The archdioces­e emphasized in a recent statement that it does not operate the drilling facility but was working with city officials and Allenco to “explore possible alternativ­e uses for the site.”

If an oil drilling district were terminated, a new one could subsequent­ly be created through a city ordinance, which would need to be approved by the City Council, Ntuk said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States