Los Angeles Times

Sabotaging the ‘ultimate deal’

-

President Trump gushed after his election about bringing Israelis and Palestinia­ns together in the “ultimate deal.” Yet now he seems poised to announce a change in U.S. policy that is likely to make such an agreement even more elusive: formally recognizin­g Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

Such an announceme­nt, which Trump is expected to make Wednesday, is both unnecessar­y as a sign of this country’s support for Israel — which is rock-solid — and needlessly provocativ­e. Its principal effect will be to cement Trump’s alliance with Israel’s hard-line right-wing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The two leaders already have bonded over their loathing for the Iran nuclear agreement and their militant opposition to Iran’s regional ambitions.

The Trump-Netanyahu alliance — and the decision to change decades of policy on Jerusalem — augur ill for the administra­tion’s attempt to revive the peace process, which Trump has entrusted to a team that inexplicab­ly includes Jared Kushner, the president’s unqualifie­d and untested sonin-law, in a prominent role. Over the weekend Kushner told a conference in Washington that solving the Israeli-Palestinia­n conflict was necessary to “create more stability in the region.” If Trump believed that, he wouldn’t engage in needless provocatio­ns.

Why is it provocativ­e to recognize what may seem obvious to some readers — that Jerusalem is the ancient capital of the Jewish nation and the seat of the modern Israeli government? Alas, it’s not that simple.

Ever since President Truman recognized Israel in 1948, successive U.S. presidents have been careful not to concede Israeli sovereignt­y over Jerusalem. Like other nations, the U.S. locates its embassy in Tel Aviv, despite repeated attempts by Congress to move the embassy to Jerusalem.

Trump promised during his campaign to physically relocate the embassy, as the Israeli right has long wanted it to, but he is now expected to postpone the move again. That makes his expected recognitio­n of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital a kind of consolatio­n prize for Netanyahu, as well as any Trump voters who care about the issue. Yet it sends the same inflammato­ry message: that Jerusalem belongs to Israel.

Of course, the U.S. never would accept a peace agreement in which Israel didn’t maintain control of West Jerusalem, which is primarily populated by Israeli Jews. A more complicate­d issue is the status of mostly Arab East Jerusalem, which Israel captured from Jordan in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War and which Palestinia­ns hope will be the future capital of a Palestinia­n state. Israel officially considers all of Jerusalem its “eternal capital.” A Trump statement acknowledg­ing “Jerusalem” as Israel’s capital might be interprete­d as endorsemen­t of Israel’s claim to the entire city.

Trump’s predecesso­rs feared that acknowledg­ing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital would undermine peace talks. Those concerns are still valid. On Saturday, Mahmoud Habbash, an advisor to Palestinia­n Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, said that U.S. recognitio­n of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital would amount to a “complete destructio­n of the peace process.” On Sunday, Jordan’s foreign minister, Ayman Safadi, warned that it might “trigger anger across the Arab and Muslim world, fuel tension and jeopardize peace efforts.”

Trump can argue, of course, that the peace process is already in a state of collapse. That’s sadly true, and the blame must be shared by both sides. Despite paying lip service to a two-state solution in which Israel would exist alongside a viable, independen­t Palestinia­n state, Netanyahu has presided over the expansion of Jewish settlement activity on the West Bank that makes that objective far harder to achieve.

The Palestinia­ns, meanwhile, have been paralyzed by divisions between Abbas’ Fatah movement, which controls the West Bank, and Hamas, which holds sway in Gaza and which has refused to accept Israel’s existence. Earlier this year the two factions announced a reconcilia­tion, and Hamas issued a statement that seemed to imply a grudging recognitio­n of Israel. But Netanyahu’s office dismissed the statement, claiming that “Hamas is attempting to fool the world, but it will not succeed.”

The fact that the peace process is moribund isn’t an argument for making it harder to revive, however. Aaron David Miller, who advised both Republican and Democratic secretarie­s of State on Arab-Israeli negotiatio­ns, said that recognizin­g Jerusalem as the capital of Israel at this time would be “the single dumbest move this administra­tion has made in the Middle East.”

The only justificat­ion for such a provocativ­e step is political: to allow Trump to say that he (sort of) fulfilled a campaign promise. That’s not good enough.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States