Los Angeles Times

‘Nutcracker’ dances in L.A.

George Balanchine’s choreograp­hy helps this production stand out from the crowd.

- By Lewis Segal calendar@latimes.com

The Music Center imports Miami City Ballet’s Cuban-tinged rendition. A review.

As an expensive Music Center import, the new Miami City Ballet production of “The Nutcracker” is both unnecessar­y and indispensa­ble.

Unnecessar­y? Sure. As seen at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion on Thursday — opening night of a six-performanc­e run — this “Nutcracker” turned out to be a Cuban-tinged staging far less distinctiv­e than many others in Southern California. After our short-lived Hollywood-style “Nutcracker” or long-running early California version, for example, who needs the conservati­ve and often dowdy Miami sets and costumes designed, respective­ly, by Ruben and Isabel Toledo?

What’s more, the high quality of the dancing on Thursday could well be matched on many local stages during the 2017 “Nutcracker” season. But this Music Center co-commission does boast impressive scale: 45 adults and 60 children plus an orchestra and chorus. And by bringing the George Balanchine “Nutcracker” back to Los Angeles, the Music Center and Miami and made the venture absolutely indispensa­ble despite its flaws.

Choreograp­hed for New York City Ballet in 1954, Balanchine’s “Nutcracker” wasn’t the first American version, but its success and influence arguably made the ballet inescapabl­e in the U.S. But beyond popularity, it’s generally considered the best anywhere, for the great ballet ensembles of Europe — in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Paris — all dance inferior or just plain dreadful choreograp­hies.

Angelenos with long memories can recall when the New York ballet presented the show outdoors at the Greek Theatre in the summer, and it was clear from the success of those performanc­es that this was no mere Christmas ornament but a major work in the 19th century classical tradition worth seeing anytime, anyplace. It’s high time to see it again, for none of the mom and pop companies that keep ballet a living art form in Southern California — or the dance-makers who consider themselves the inheritors of the Balanchine mantle — can give us anything equal to its authentici­ty and authority.

Miami has been dancing it for 28 years and delivered its storytelli­ng scenes ably on Thursday, but “The Nutcracker” grew most satisfying in the great neoclassic passages: the intricate Snowf lake ensemble and the masterly interplay of soloist and corps in the Waltz of the Flowers; the complex partnering-on-the-run of the grand pas de deux; the wit and charm of the last-act divertisse­ments. Yes, it mattered that the company staged those brilliant Act 2 showpieces against the backdrop of a giant pretzel that looked like prison bars. But in an imperfect world, an imperfect Balanchine “Nutcracker” is still cause for celebratio­n, and the involvemen­t of many different institutio­ns — among them the Colburn School and the Los Angeles Children’s Chorus — added luster to the performanc­e.

Miami will rotate its leading dancers, and the Thursday cast sustained the level of spirit and technical finesse we expect from millennial American dancers. Strongly partnered by Renan Cerdeiro, Jennifer Lauren danced the grand pas with a wondrous ease and serenity compared to her rather cautious performanc­e of the Sugar Plum solo. As Dewdrop in the Waltz of the Flowers, Nathalia Arja made every entrance and exit an exciting exclamatio­n point. But for all her diligence Jordan-Elizabeth Long couldn’t bring the dated exotic/erotic Arabian dance to life.

Male prowess flourished with Shimon Ito’s Chinese dance and Kleber Rebello’s lead Candy Cane — both performanc­es displaying perfectly placed multiple jumps. Among the welldrille­d and spirited children (dominant in Act 1, ornamental in the last act), the sweet Marie of Renata Adarvez and elegant Little Prince of Erick Rojas deserved their prominence. Reyneris Reyes mimed effectivel­y as Drosselmei­er.

The lighting by James F. Ingalls often stayed dim — perhaps to allow the elaborate and sometimes finicky projection­s by Wendall K. Harrington to make their ideal effect. In the Snow Scene, for instance, the dancers enjoyed plenty of light, but the forest backdrop remained scarcely visible. Just before that sequence came perhaps the most beautiful and essential stage-effect of the evening: nothing but falling snow and gleaming stars. It lasted for a moment or two but made the ensuing scenic extravagan­ce seem one more unnecessar­y choice.

The beloved if overfamili­ar Tchaikovsk­y score sometimes found conductor Gary Sheldon enforcing orchestral cohesion with slow tempos and a lack of forward momentum, but he served the dancers ably.

 ?? Photograph­s by Lawrence K. Ho ?? THIS PRODUCTION of “The Nutcracker” combines George Balanchine’s classic choreograp­hy with Cuban-inf luenced sets and costumes.
Photograph­s by Lawrence K. Ho THIS PRODUCTION of “The Nutcracker” combines George Balanchine’s classic choreograp­hy with Cuban-inf luenced sets and costumes.
 ??  ?? THE PERFORMERS include 60 children, 45 adults, an orchestra and a chorus.
THE PERFORMERS include 60 children, 45 adults, an orchestra and a chorus.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States