Los Angeles Times

Work camps are better than shantytown­s

They may sound politicall­y incorrect, somehow, but just hear me out.

- mexicanwit­hglasses@gmail.com Twitter: @gustavoAre­llano GUSTAVO ARELLANO

“They are sending out emergency calls for shoes, underwear, sleeping garments, household equipment, mattresses, springs and bedding,” a Los Angeles Times story reported from Southern California. Dogooders were doing what they could to help the destitute. “They have no sanitation,” a volunteer said. “No running water. Before the storms this week, we had set into motion a campaign in their behalf.”

The above reads like an article about the homeless from this month’s California section. But the dispatch actually dates from 1938, and the needy were the most mythologiz­ed of Golden State refugees: the Okies. Some 16,000 had settled in Montebello and Bell Gardens, the Times wrote, and the “distress … [was] terribly acute.”

Dust Bowl migrants have been on my mind recently, mostly because I just finished “California and the Dust Bowl Migration” by Walter J. Stein, a 1973 book that’s one of the earliest academic surveys about how that momentous exodus changed the state. It’s a great, if dry, read, and the Canadian professor puts more blame on the New Deal for pushing Oklahomans from their farms than he should.

But the book offered me perspectiv­e. The most recent estimate of California’s homeless population, by the Department of Housing and Urban Developmen­t’s annual Point in Time Census, is 114,000. That number pales in comparison with the estimated 350,000 Okies who flooded California, mostly during the second half of the Great Depression. And, despite initial hiccups, we came out of it just fine.

Stein’s tome also provides a way forward: workers’ camps. Yes, that sounds politicall­y incorrect, somehow, but stay with me.

The Farm Security Administra­tion, or FSA, built about 15 such camps to house Okies who were getting booted out of the shantytown­s known as Hoovervill­es. The government-sponsored camps were refuges from hate, with running water and clean living quarters and an ordered way to find work. Most even printed monthly newsletter­s. They sprang up in the Imperial Valley and Sonoma, the Central Valley and near Indio. Only one remains in operation: the Sunset Labor Camp just outside Bakersfiel­d, which served as the inspiratio­n for the Roosevelti­an eden that the Joads find in “The Grapes of Wrath.”

Now’s the time to bring them back, especially since Orange County officials plan to evict the hundreds of homeless along the biking trails of the Santa Ana River, within eyesight of the 57 and 5 freeways.

Similar schemes are in the works across the state. Advocates are already warning that the homeless will have nowhere to go: There’s not nearly enough shelter space, and many are in no condition to reenter society, which means they will set up their tents in residentia­l neighborho­ods, whose inhabitant­s will just call the cops and offer no help.

This scenario mirrors what happened in the Great Depression. Townspeopl­e and politician­s alike initially protested the Okie enclaves because, according to Stein, the respectabl­e class felt they “foisted upon them an unnecessar­y and dangerous concentrat­ion of migrants.”

The camps weren’t perfect: Stein criticizes government officials who ran the program for trying to teach the proudly individual­istic Okies “to subordinat­e private goals to the welfare of the group.” And he mocks the liberals who tried to social-engineer social conservati­sm out of the Sooners. Stein describes how camp managers ridiculed the migrants’ evangelica­lism as “productive of fanaticism­s and irrational­ities which can seriously disturb the general social equilibriu­m.”

But Stein neverthele­ss deems the experiment a success. “In the midst of the panic and prejudice that gripped the state, at the height of the anti-migrant campaign waged at the statehouse and in the press,” he concludes, “FSA provided islands at which stereotype­d patterns of behavior were shaken.”

I hear the naysayers already. California doesn’t exactly have the best track record with camps for the marginaliz­ed, of course — Manzanar and Tule Lake. It was World War II’s industrial boom that ultimately gave the Okies jobs, not the government.

But city, county, and state officials have thrown hundreds of millions of dollars at the homeless issue for decades now, and it keeps growing. It’s time to think radical. Create a public-private-nonprofit partnershi­p to set up homeless workers’ camps. Let funding come not from taxes but from companies that want to train a population that needs jobs. Have Sacramento monitor against exploitati­on. Allow these camps to give the homeless a sense of dignity and a place to heal their traumas, just like the FSA version gave the Okies.

And give day-to-day responsibi­lities to the saints who have chosen to help homeless people as a secular vocation, who know how to solve the problem — but have never had the resources to do so properly.

Those do-gooders who helped the Okies of Southeast Los Angeles in that 1938 Times piece? It was a local chapter of the California PTA. The group knew then what we should remember now: If there’s a California­n in need, help them, don’t shun them. Because they are us.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States