Los Angeles Times

Lawmakers focusing on easing sting of disasters

State legislatio­n includes several bills that would change insurance rules.

- By Liam Dillon

Dozens of California­ns lost their lives in wildfires and other natural disasters in recent months.

In response to the widespread emergencie­s, Gov. Jerry Brown and legislator­s want to change insurance rules, emergency alert systems and debris removal policies and spend more money on fire protection. If passed, these new laws would add to the many protection­s already enshrined in state law for those who have experience­d natural disasters, including substantia­l relief from property taxes.

State officials are warning that residents should expect more natural disasters due to the effects of climate change.

“Sadly, what these communitie­s and these members’ residents have experience­d is now going to be far too common in California,” Insurance Commission­er Dave Jones said last week at a news conference while surrounded by state lawmakers. “We no longer have a fire season. We have year-round fire season.”

Here are some proposals lawmakers are debating:

Eight bills address disaster victims’ relationsh­ip with insurance companies. Democratic state Sen. Mike McGuire, who represents communitie­s affected by last fall’s North Bay fires, said more than a hundred constituen­ts have contacted his office with “horror stories.” Residents, he said, are struggling to remember everything they owned before the fire, and in some cases, provide receipts to their insurance companies.

“We’re getting calls from survivors literally experienci­ng PTSD, people having to relive the most horrific night of their lives and recall and attempt to put a price on their most priceless possession­s,” McGuire said. “It’s simply too much to ask.”

McGuire’s legislatio­n, Senate Bill 897, would force insurance companies to accept consumers’ tallies of items lost to natural disasters and pay out no less than 80% of the policy limit even if residents don’t have a full list of what was lost.

If McGuire’s bill passes, it would apply to victims of wildfires late last year.

The rest of the legislatio­n

would benefit only those affected by future disasters. Six bills want to address underinsur­ance and policy cancellati­ons in fire-prone areas. North Bay residents have complained that insurance companies are telling them they don’t have enough coverage to rebuild their homes.

SB 894 from Sen. Bill Dodd (D-Napa) allows residents to combine coverage from their primary homes and other buildings they might have insured to rebuild their main residence.

Assembly Bill 1797 from Assemblyma­n Marc Levine (D-San Rafael) requires an insurer to provide updated estimates of the full replacemen­t costs of their homes at the time of annual policy renewal. Two other bills from Levine, AB 1800 and AB 1799, ensure that residents can collect the full replacemen­t cost of their home even if they decide to rebuild at another location and would require insurers to provide complete policy documents, instead of just summaries, to residents upon request.

AB 1875 from Assemblyma­n Jim Wood (D-Healdsburg) would mandate that insurance companies make available policies covering no less than 150% of their home replacemen­t costs. A measure from Sen. Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens), SB 824, would make it harder for insurance companies to cancel or reduce coverage in areas at risk for fires by making the state insurance commission­er sign off on such decisions.

AB 1722 from Assemblywo­man Cecilia Aguiar Curry (D-Winters) gives property owners three years to rebuild their home after a natural disaster and still receive the full replacemen­t cost from their insurance company. Currently the deadline is two years, but Aguiar-Curry argues demand for constructi­on after an emergency often outpaces supply.

Two bills, SB 833 from McGuire and SB 821 from Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara), would expand the reach of emergency alert systems.

County officials in Northern California faced broad criticism when widespread emergency alert systems were not activated at the start of fall’s wildfires. Later on, when fires threatened Southern California, state officials sent warnings to 12 million residents to prepare them.

McGuire’s bill gives the state’s Office of Emergency Services more authority to issue alerts, while Jackson’s allows the state to assist local government­s in developing their own systems.

Though investigat­ors have yet to determine causes for last year’s major wildfires in Northern and Southern California, lawmakers are pitching two bills that would toughen penalties for those found responsibl­e. SB 819 from Sen. Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) would prohibit electric utilities from passing along the costs of fines or penalties to ratepayers if those companies were found at fault. SB 901 from Dodd requires electric companies’ wildfire plans to include details about when they should de-energize power lines during high winds or other risky conditions.

Other efforts would address translatio­n needs and ease cleanup and the fee burden on affected homeowners. Activists in Ventura County criticized the lack of Spanish translatio­n services in the region’s response to the wildfires. AB 1877 from Assemblywo­man Monique Limón (D-Santa Barbara) requires the state to translate its emergency communicat­ions into the language other than English that is most spoken in an affected area. Limón also plans to introduce a bill that would speed up debris removal, according to a spokeswoma­n. When rebuilding, homeowners would be subject to a new $75 fee on most real estate transactio­ns to fund low-income housing developmen­t. Assemblywo­man Sharon Quirk-Silva (D-Fullerton) has written AB 1765 to exempt people affected by disasters from paying the fee.

“The role of government is to assist in aiding California­ns in recovering from such tragedies, not profit from them,” Quirk-Silva said in a release.

Brown has proposed lots of new spending in his 2018-19 state budget to fight fires. His plan would allocate $2.27 billion to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection — $1.3 billion more than in the budget four years ago.

This year’s plan includes nearly $100 million for four new firefighti­ng helicopter­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States