Haspel should not head the CIA

Re “Trump’s CIA pick to face scrutiny over torture,” March 14

Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris, California’s two Democratic U.S. senators, should support the rule of law by rejecting the nomination of President Trump’s pick to head the Central Intelligence Agency, Gina Haspel, who presided over the torturing of detainees at a “black site” in Thailand and then destroyed videotape evidence of these acts.

Haspel cannot hide behind the Nazi-era defense, “I was just following orders.” In the wake of the Nuremberg trials, the United Nations International Law Commission confirmed that “the fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.”

The U.N. Convention Against Torture, in effect at the time of Haspel’s conduct, made clear that “No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.”

Feinstein and Harris should uphold U.S. and international law by voting against the nomination of a person who can credibly be accused of having committed war crimes. Stephen F. Rohde

Los Angeles The writer is a constitutional lawyer.