Bipartisan scapegoats

Re “How immigration enforcement helps black men,” Opinion, March 16

Dave Seminara fails to note that backlash against immigrants has also occurred under Democratic leadership.

In the 1930s, there were millions of deportations under the leadership of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, and as a child I remember the roundups in Los Angeles that created fear and panic under President Carter. And how can we forget President Obama, who prom-ised immigration reform but instead earned the title “deporter in chief ”?

Complaints about immigrants tend to fade during economic boom times, but when the economy goes south, immigrants are scapegoated. In California, we have made progress in moving beyond blaming immigrants for the lack of opportunities for other minorities.

I await Seminara’s continued dispatches in which he will hopefully show how millions of Americans are flocking to take manual labor jobs in the agriculture and service sectors that are being vacated by immigrant labor. Salvador Jimenez

Los Angeles

Seminara’s courageous piece reminds us how a policy that benefits one segment of society may hurt another.

At a time when the issue of homelessness is under examination, it is important to take into account all variables that directly or indirectly contribute to the problem. Statistics show that although African Americans make up about 13% of our country’s population, they account for about 40% of its homeless population.

Are our current immigration policies aggravating black homelessness? Addressing this question should be part of a bipartisan effort to better understand the complexity of the problem. Like it or not, sanctuary cities are not excluded from the responsibility of acknowledging the problem and taking steps to address it. Berta Graciano-Buchman

Beverly Hills