Los Angeles Times

Dealing drugs is not murder

-

Re “Sessions backs death for drug dealers,” March 22 President Trump wants to give the death penalty to drug dealers.

Maybe if he was not so busy losing or firing people in the Justice Department and the FBI, some attorney or law enforcemen­t officer would have told him that a constituti­onal amendment is needed to do that because the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled it is a violation of the 8th Amendment’s prohibitio­n of cruel and unusual punishment to impose the death penalty for any crime other than murder.

Drug dealing does not qualify. Robert S. Henry San Gabriel The writer is a retired capital case coordinato­r with the California attorney general’s office.

So Trump (and now Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions) suggests prosecutor­s consider the death penalty for drug dealers.

Look out, Walgreens, CVS, Purdue Pharma and other major sellers and manufactur­ers of addictive drugs — you may very well find yourselves in front of a firing line.

Oh, that’s right, the ethically bereft system of capitalism has your back; profits are being made even if people are dying. Never mind, you’ll be OK. Justin Webb Los Angeles

I find it interestin­g that Trump’s focus in the new war on drugs in rural New Hampshire is on “getting tough” on dealers, not on drug users. In contrast, the “war on drugs” from the 1980s was focused on drug users in cities, filling our prisons and jails with African Americans and Latinos.

Now in rural New Hampshire, selling drugs is defined as a crime, while becoming addicted is defined as an illness. Doris Isolini Nelson Los Angeles

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States