Los Angeles Times

Educationa­l leadership styles: Which one fits you?

- — Kate Lopaze, The Job Network

I f you’re looking to take your career in education to the next level, part of that means understand­ing what kind of leadership skills you have — and how you’d apply those in your job. Because educators are already a pretty diverse crowd, it should be no surprise that leadership styles can vary pretty widely too. So let’s look at the main types of educationa­l leaders.

The Authoritar­ian

This sounds severe, but the authoritat­ive leader is the one who is able to set a clear direction or implement a new vision. This means the leader is a decision-maker, often the final say. The authoritat­ive leader is often the cheerleade­r-in-chief, motivating a team (or multiple teams) toward a single goal. The authoritat­ive leader is a confident, strong voice, and comfortabl­e making decisions. If you feel more comfortabl­e giving orders than taking them taking them, then this might be your style.

Pro: Things get done how you want them done.

Con: Team members may have trouble connecting to this kind of leader, since they’re less engaged in the decisionma­king process.

The Team Builder

This kind of leader, also known as an affiliativ­e leader, focuses on building, maintainin­g, and repairing relationsh­ips. The affiliativ­e leader’s priority is on harmony and collective productivi­ty. This type of leader typically strives to get input from others and have good relationsh­ips with everyone on the team, rather than hand down assignment­s.

Pro: Team members feel valued and connected.

Con: Poor performanc­e is sometimes ignored in favor of maintainin­g larger group harmony.

The Politician

This kind of leader, also known as the democratic leadership type, works on consensus. This leader has the final say, but relies on having other stakeholde­rs weigh in as well. The diverse perspectiv­es can foster creativity and innovation, because everyone is able to give input and share their points of view.

Pro: Team members feel more engaged because they have a say in the process.

Con: Decisions may not happen quickly if you’re waiting for mass buy-in.

The Coach

The coaching-focused leader prioritize­s team developmen­t over immediate achievemen­t. Meeting goals is about the process, and providing feedback and instructio­n to make sure that members of the team are able to succeed in the project at hand, or on a more long-term basis. It’s also a natural leadership style for many teachers, who are already accustomed to nurturing talent to hit milestones. In this role, the coaching leader often delegates tasks and responsibi­lity to help team members understand and learn in a handson way.

Pro: This is a very forward-thinking leadership style, and encourages team members to set and achieve their own goals. Con: It can be time-consuming to incorporat­e feedback and ongoing training. Also, if team members are resistant to learning, that can also slow overall progress.

The Visionary

The visionary leader is focused on innovating and improving outcomes. For these leaders, the status quo is less important than setting goals and improving how students learn, how teachers work in the classroom, etc. The visionary leader typically spends a lot of time brainstorm­ing and engaging others in common goals.

Pro: Employees feel empowered to find new ways to accomplish goals.

Con: Sometimes focusing on the big picture can lead to neglect of the everyday, or less interestin­g tasks at hand.

There is no one-size-fits-all leadership style for an educator, or even a school. So depending on your personalit­y and your goals, it may be that one of these suits you really well — and others not at all. Whatever your leadership style is, it’s important to nurture those qualities and find leadership opportunit­ies that work for you.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States