Los Angeles Times

CIA pick’s confirmati­on looks certain

Five Democrats plan to vote for Gina Haspel, who would be the first woman to lead the spy agency.

- By Chris Megerian chris.megerian @latimes.com

WASHINGTON — Gina Haspel, President Trump’s nominee to run the CIA, is on track to be confirmed by the Senate after key Democrats announced their support on Tuesday.

Her nomination has been deeply controvers­ial because she once ran a secret prison in Thailand where detainees were waterboard­ed after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. That chapter in her 33-year career remains shrouded in mystery because officials have refused to declassify more informatio­n about it.

But Sens. Mark R. Warner (D-Va.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Bill Nelson (DFla.) said on Tuesday they would vote for her. Warner is vice chairman of the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee.

Warner’s support came after Haspel sent him a letter in which she said that the CIA’s secret prison network had been a mistake from the start.

“With the benefit of hindsight and my experience as a senior agency leader, the enhanced interrogat­ion program is not one the CIA should have undertaken,” Haspel wrote.

The statement went a step further than Haspel had been willing to go in her confirmati­on hearing, in which she pledged to never revive the interrogat­ion program.

After the confirmati­on hearing last week, two Democrats, Sens. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Joe Donnelly of Indiana, announced they would back Haspel.

Two Republican­s, Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and John McCain of Arizona, oppose her nomination.

Republican­s have a 51-49 majority in the Senate. With Paul and McCain opposing Haspel, Democratic support became crucial to her confirmati­on.

Now, support from five Democrats means Haspel probably has the votes she needs. She would be the first woman to head the spy agency, as well as the first operations officer in decades to rise through the ranks to the top spot.

It’s unclear when the Senate will hold the vote.

Haspel faced an uncertain path to confirmati­on two months ago when Trump announced her as his nominee to replace Mike Pompeo, the former Republican congressma­n who is now secretary of State.

Although she received strong support from the intelligen­ce community, including former CIA directors who served under presidents from both political parties, Haspel’s role in the interrogat­ion program led to an outcry from human rights activists and many Democrats.

In announcing his support, Warner said he believed she would be a capable director.

“Over the last year I’ve had the opportunit­y to work with Ms. Haspel in her role as deputy director, and I have always found her to be profession­al and forthright with the Intelligen­ce Committee,” Warner said in a statement.

“Most importantl­y, I believe she is someone who can and will stand up to the president if ordered to do something illegal or immoral — like a return to torture.”

Heitkamp said Haspel had assured her that torture would never be used again.

“While I trust her word, I will also verify, helping to ensure Congress conducts robust oversight of the CIA under her leadership,” Heitkamp said.

California’s senators, both Democrats, remain opposed to Haspel.

“The United States must send a message to the world that we hold ourselves to a higher standard than our enemies,” said a statement from Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the former chairwoman of the Intelligen­ce Committee, who spearheade­d a critical 2014 report on the agency’s interrogat­ion program.

Sen. Kamala Harris said on Twitter that supporting Haspel would send “the wrong signal to the CIA workforce, the American people, and countries abroad about our values.”

McCain, a steadfast critic of torture who suffered abuse as a prisoner during the Vietnam War, announced his opposition to Haspel after her confirmati­on hearing, when she declined to say whether the CIA’s past practices were immoral. He’s been fighting cancer at home in Arizona, and it’s unclear whether he will be able to return to Capitol Hill to cast a vote.

“I believe Gina Haspel is a patriot who loves our country and has devoted her profession­al life to its service and defense,” he said in a statement. “However, Ms. Haspel’s role in overseeing the use of torture by Americans is disturbing. Her refusal to acknowledg­e torture’s immorality is disqualify­ing.”

‘I believe she is someone who can and will stand up to the president if ordered to do something illegal or immoral — like a return to torture.’ — Sen. Mark R. Warner, Democrat from Virginia

 ?? Salwan Georges Washington Post ?? GINA HASPEL at her confirmati­on hearing last week. Her nomination has been controvers­ial because she once ran a secret prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Salwan Georges Washington Post GINA HASPEL at her confirmati­on hearing last week. Her nomination has been controvers­ial because she once ran a secret prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States