Los Angeles Times

Jim McDonnell for sheriff

- Im McDonnell

Jwas elected as Los Angeles County sheriff in late 2014 amid high hopes. How could he help but do better than Lee Baca, who was sentenced to three years in federal prison for presiding over a conspiracy to obstruct a federal probe into violence at the county jails? Baca’s former undersheri­ff, Paul Tanaka, already is in prison for his role in the scheme. The two men and their top staff ran the department’s fiber and morale into the ground with a program of patronage, cronyism and cover-ups.

McDonnell was not merely some run-ofthe-mill cop with political ambitions. He became aware of the depth of the department’s problems while serving as a member of a county Jail Violence Commission that focused on the unconscion­able abuse and neglect of inmates. He co-authored a searing report that critiqued a toxic culture of arrogance and mismanagem­ent and a deepset resistance to accountabi­lity. He helped craft detailed recommenda­tions for recovery. As a candidate he spoke with approval of criminal justice reform measures to emphasize second chances and expressed a preference for drug treatment over incarcerat­ion. He was well-positioned as the chief of the Long Beach Police Department and the former second-in-command of the Los Angeles Police Department to take Baca’s job. He was a consummate law enforcemen­t insider, yet a refreshing Los Angeles County Sheriff ’s Department outsider.

By the time he took over as sheriff, he had become the symbol of a new direction for the department.

Now, as he concludes his first term and seeks a second, he is being challenged by Sheriff’s Lt. Alex Villanueva and retired Sheriff ’s Cmdr. Bob Lindsey, both of whom say McDonnell has bungled his makeover of the department by promoting unworthy personnel and imposing unfair discipline on front-line deputies, leaving an underperfo­rming force with low morale and an inability to fill hundreds of vacancies.

Incumbent L.A. County sheriffs are generally unassailab­le at reelection time, boasting a clear advantage in name recognitio­n and fundraisin­g prowess. Yet McDonnell’s challenger­s have done remarkably well. Villanueva has won the endorsemen­t of the Los Angeles County Democratic Party. Lindsey claims the lead in fundraisin­g.

McDonnell’s administra­tion has had its ups and downs, so if either of his opponents were to lay out a comprehens­ive program for running a modern Sheriff ’s Department that reflected the best thinking on criminal justice reform, public safety and jail management, he would merit serious considerat­ion. But both Villanueva and Lindsey focus too much on internal issues and resentment­s of the rank-and-file and insufficie­ntly on how the department could better serve the county’s 10 million people.

Of the three, McDonnell remains the best choice, although in many respects he has thus far fallen short of his early promise.

Poor communicat­ion leaves the department aloof from the public. Workforce problems (low morale, an inability to hire) persist. As other law enforcemen­t leaders around the nation assert leadership in solving pressing criminal justice issues, such as smarter bail policies and diversion programs for less serious criminals, McDonnell sometimes appears to be leading California’s forces of reaction and retrenchme­nt. Changing times call for the leader of the nation’s largest sheriff ’s department to take a central role in mapping out public safety practices that emphasize rehabilita­tion and diversion from arrest and incarcerat­ion for people suffering addiction or mental illness; but the L.A. County Sheriff ’s Department is not currently among the groundbrea­kers.

There has been a discomfiti­ng array of deputy misbehavio­r or worse on McDonnell’s watch. Consider, for example, the deputy alleged to have raped inmates at the women’s jail in Lynwood; the video of the deputy ignoring a call of “shots fired” so he could talk on the phone to his girlfriend; the offensive racially charged emails sent by the sheriff ’s then-chief of staff; the succession of shootings of unarmed men; the continuing deaths at the county jails; and the charges against a sergeant for demanding sex in exchange for time off.

There will be problems in any organizati­on the size of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, with its more than 17,000 employees, and certainly McDonnell deserves credit for responding swiftly to the various charges. Yet the incidents give evidence that the makeover of his department remains a work in progress.

McDonnell likewise deserves a measure of patience, given the scope of his task. He runs the nation’s largest jail and consequent­ly is also the nation’s largest provider of mental health services. He must manage contracts with 42 cities, the courts and community colleges, while also dispatchin­g deputies to patrol county parks and hospitals and to conduct search and rescue operations across 4,751 square miles.

He is hampered by a civil service system that returns to duty many of the deputies he fires for misconduct. His laudable attempt to share with the district attorney the names of deputies who have histories of lying or other misconduct has so far been blocked by a deputies’ union lawsuit.

So what more could Los Angeles residents demand?

To some extent, they already have made their demands. In overwhelmi­ngly adopting criminal justice reform measures such as propositio­ns 47 and 57 and AB 109, they have a right to expect a sheriff who will make those reforms work, rather than blame them unfairly for an uptick in crime — while simultaneo­usly touting decreases in crime. They should expect their sheriff to take the lead on bail reform, so that suspects don’t sit in jail awaiting trial merely because they can’t afford to bail out. They should ask him to apply to his overcrowde­d jails — in which convicted misdemeana­nts serve just 10% of their sentences and some are released the same day they arrive — a triage model, in which he assesses the risk of each inmate to reoffend, keeps the most dangerous people the longest and directs others to proven treatment or rehabilita­tion programs.

As the best of the three candidates, McDonnell should get another term. Let’s hope he uses it to take a more forward position, leading the county into a more rational public safety and criminal justice system.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States