Los Angeles Times

Trump moves to further limit access to abortion

New proposal would expand restrictio­ns on use of federal funds by organizati­ons such as Planned Parenthood.

- By Noam N. Levey noam.levey@latimes.com Times staff writer Noah Bierman contribute­d to this report.

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion moved Friday to place new restrictio­ns on access to abortion, as the Health and Human Services Department prepared new regulation­s that would effectivel­y bar organizati­ons that receive federal family planning money from providing abortions or counseling women about how to get the procedure.

The much-anticipate­d proposal — which has not yet been officially issued as a rule — would greatly expand limits on what activities organizati­ons such as Planned Parenthood can provide.

And it almost certainly will set off a new legal battle over abortion services.

According to the White House, the proposal would require recipients of Title X family planning funds to establish a “bright line of physical as well as financial separation” between federally funded family planning services and any programs where abortion services are performed or discussed.

The administra­tion says this is not a “gag rule” that would prohibit discussion­s of abortion services.

But the proposal would greatly expand restrictio­ns on the use of federal funds. Currently abortion providers must ensure that no federal money is used to pay for the procedure.

And many family planning advocates believe that the new rule, if implemente­d, would make it effectivel­y impossible for many clinicians to talk freely with women about their options.

“This ‘gag rule’ is not only unconscion­able, but it undermines medical ethics by forcing healthcare profession­als to withhold accurate and timely medical informatio­n from patients,” said Dr. Jenn Conti, a fellow with Physicians for Reproducti­ve Health.

A host of antiaborti­on groups cheered the moves.

“We thank President Trump for taking action to disentangl­e taxpayers from the abortion business,” said Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfels­er. “This is a major victory which will energize the grass roots as we head into the critical midterm elections.”

Trump, whose past pronouncem­ents in support of abortion rights once made social conservati­ves nervous, is scheduled to speak Tuesday at the Susan B. Anthony List’s annual gala.

The White House cast the new proposal as the latest in the administra­tion’s moves to fulfill Trump’s campaign promise to restrict access to abortion services.

The Trump administra­tion has strongly supported GOP bills to roll back the Affordable Care Act that include provisions to cut off funding to Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest provider of abortion services.

Those bills failed, as the campaign to repeal the 2010 healthcare law collapsed.

But antiaborti­on rights groups have kept up their campaign to squeeze off government funding for Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers.

In the crosshairs has been Title X, the nation’s first federal program dedicated to supporting family planning services.

Since its inception in 1970, Title X has funded thousands of clinics and other medical providers.

The money has never been used to pay for abortions. But because some recipients of Title X funding have also provided abortion services, Title X has been a longtime target of social conservati­ves.

In the 1980s, President Reagan’s administra­tion proposed regulation­s to bar clinicians at any organizati­on receiving Title X funding from providing abortion counseling or referral, even when requested by a pregnant woman.

This so-called domestic gag rule was challenged in court and upheld by the Supreme Court, but by then President Clinton was in office and he stopped implementa­tion of the rule. It was never reinstated.

The new proposal from the Trump administra­tion would not explicitly prohibit organizati­ons that receive Title X money from counseling women about abortion services, according to the White House.

But it would change the long-standing requiremen­t that family planning counseling include a discussion about the full range of options available, including abortion. And it would prevent Title X recipients from referring women who want abortions to providers that offer these services.

That would mark a major step backward, said Kinsey Hasstedt, senior policy manager at the Guttmacher Institute, a nonprofit that studies family planning and abortion.

“Title X is based around the concept of patient-centered care,” she said. “It requires that all pregnant patients receive counseling on and referral for the full range of pregnancy options.”

Equally troubling, Hasstedt and others say, is that the new rule could make it impossible for organizati­ons that provide abortion services to get Title X funding.

For decades, Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers have segregated funding to ensure that Title X money is not used to pay for abortions.

The Trump administra­tion now appears to be saying that this segregatio­n is inadequate.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States