Los Angeles Times

Gaza militias announce truce; Israel tacitly agrees

Hamas and other groups sign cease-fire among themselves. Netanyahu warns against more violence.

- By Noga Tarnopolsk­y Tarnopolsk­y is a special correspond­ent. Special correspond­ent Hana Salah contribute­d to this report.

GAZA CITY — Fighting between Israel and Islamist movements in the Gaza Strip, which started with a sudden barrage of rockets launched into southern Israel, came to a swift end Wednesday with the announceme­nt of a unilateral cease-fire.

More than a dozen Gazabased militias, including the military wings of the ruling Hamas movement and the Islamic Jihad group, signed the agreement among themselves. Israel had blamed them for an almost 24-hour salvo of rockets and mortar rounds that prompted a fierce Israeli response.

Israel was not a party to the pact but indicated it will tacitly accept a cease-fire “as long as they stop their terror attacks,” said the Israeli army spokesman, Brig. Gen. Ronen Manelis.

According to the Israeli military, the Gaza-based Islamic Jihad fired about 180 Iranian-made rockets and mortar shells into Israel. The barrage included the use of a precise 107-millimeter rocket that can reach over six miles into Israeli territory.

In retaliatio­n, the Israeli army said it struck 65 Hamas and Islamic Jihad targets throughout the Gaza Strip, including a tunnel that extended deep into Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula and penetrated half a mile into Israel.

No casualties were reported in Gaza. Seven Israelis were reported wounded by shrapnel in Tuesday’s attack.

In a joint statement announcing the agreement, Islamic Jihad took responsibi­lity for the fusillade and indirectly elevated its profile among the factions struggling to compete with Hamas for control in Gaza. The statement added, without further explanatio­n, “The time has passed when the enemy sets the rules of confrontat­ion and alone changes the conflict’s equations.”

The militias dedicated the day of fighting to what they described as 118 “martyrs” who have been killed by Israeli gunfire in weekly border clashes that started two months ago, and claimed “readiness to confront with all our strength any aggression or folly perpetrate­d by the enemy.” Israel has said that about 115 people, most of them affiliated with Hamas or other armed groups, were killed.

The abrupt halt to rocket fire Wednesday supported speculatio­n that Egypt, which borders Gaza to the south, brokered the ceasefire in the hope of avoiding the sort of conflagrat­ion that led to the 2014 war between Israel and Hamas, in which more than 2,000 Palestinia­ns and about 70 Israelis, most of them soldiers, lost their lives.

Egypt did not publicly acknowledg­e a role, but its semioffici­al Middle East News Agency reported that the Egyptian government will host a meeting Thursday about Gaza with the Palestinia­n Authority and Jordan. The Palestinia­n Authority has little control over Gaza and was not a party to the latest conflict or the cease-fire agreement.

Implicitly acknowledg­ing an end to the latest spurt of violence, Israel’s minister for regional cooperatio­n, Tzachi Hanegbi, said he expected Hamas, which Israel holds responsibl­e for any violence emanating from Gaza, to strike again.

“Any agreement with a terror organizati­on is by definition slippery and temporary,” he said on a radio news show. “A terror organizati­on is a terror organizati­on, and if it doesn’t do terror, it loses its reason for being.”

Speaking at a public event in Tel Aviv, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Hamas of a punitive military response should it return to violence at Israel’s border.

“When they test us, they pay an immediate price. It they continue to test us, they will pay an even harsher price,” he said.

News of the “indirect cease-fire” was transmitte­d to Jerusalem via Egyptian officials, according to a Foreign Ministry official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

Israel has said it will meet “quiet with quiet” but is “prepared for any scenario,” according to Manelis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States