Los Angeles Times

Anti-Israel or anti-Semitic?

-

Freedom of speech on college campuses is under enough pressure without the federal government threatenin­g to withdraw funding to punish people for expressing their political opinions. That would be a real possibilit­y if Congress enacted and President Trump signed a bill called the AntiSemiti­sm Awareness Act of 2018.

Recently reintroduc­ed, the legislatio­n purports to target harassment of Jewish students on college campuses, which has occurred in California and elsewhere.

But this proposal would blur the distinctio­n between unacceptab­le, intimidati­ng expression­s of intoleranc­e directed against Jews with criticism of the state of Israel. The latter, even when expressed in intemperat­e terms, is protected by the 1st Amendment.

Civil rights law already protects religious groups at federally funded campuses from discrimina­tion. What would change under this legislatio­n is that, in investigat­ing complaints of anti-Semitism on campus, the Department of Education would have to “take into considerat­ion” a definition published by the State Department in 2010.

But that lengthy document, which was never intended to serve as a speech code for college campuses, conflates anti-Israel speech with anti-Semitic speech. For example, it offers examples of “ways in which antiSemiti­sm manifests itself with regard to the state of Israel.” That includes: “Blaming Israel for all inter-religious or political tensions” and “applying double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.” It also includes “demonizing” Israel.

But is it necessaril­y anti-Semitic to harshly criticize the Jewish state or to do so without, in the same breath, criticizin­g Iran? Is it anti-Semitic to argue that Israel should be replaced by something else, such as a secular, binational nation?

Even those who believe such criticisms of Israel are simplistic or unfair should see that they are far removed from the sort of attacks that a university or the federal government can police without running afoul of the 1st Amendment. Even strong supporters of the state of Israel should acknowledg­e that while there are, of course, anti-Semites among Israel’s many critics, not all opposition to Israel is inherently anti-Semitic.

The proposed bill should be shelved.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States