Los Angeles Times

Entertainm­ent is up in air

- Sherry Runyon South Pasadena Have a travel question or dilemma? Write to travel@latimes.com. We regret we cannot answer every inquiry.

Question: I recently flew from Barcelona, Spain, to Los Angeles on two flights. I was surprised that there were no individual seat-back screens available to distract us with movies or programs. We were expected to watch movies on our tiny cellphones (or tablets), using a downloaded app for the combined 13 hours in the air. This was quite a surprise. Only 18 months before, another airline had provided seat-back screens. Hope this is not a trend.

Answer: Runyon has seen the future, and it’s … confusing, because the consistenc­y of the experience, never mind the quality of it, varies wildly.

My own recent experience baffled me. On June 1, I flew a red-eye from LAX to Washington Dulles on a major airline. My coach seat was cozy (ahem), but I was distracted (easily) by seat-back entertainm­ent, which was stocked with fairly current movies, including “Black Panther” and some that still had an Oscar glow about them.

On the morning of June 4, I flew back to LAX from Dulles. This time, the upgrade gods had granted my wish. There I was in first class where (for 15,000 points and $75) drinks were offered before takeoff, a meal and snacks were served and pleasantri­es were exchanged.

Perhaps most surprising was that despite this sort of genteel atmosphere, there were four smallish overhead screens for the 24 of us.

An announceme­nt before takeoff advised us to download the airline app to see what else was available. If not, our choice for the first 160 minutes of our flight was the movie “Molly’s Game,” which I had seen. Instead, I worked a little and dozed a little, waking up in time to see the movie’s federal judge mouth (because I didn’t have earbuds in) the sentence conferred on Molly Bloom, whose highstakes poker games were a bet that went bad.

Sort of like in-flight entertainm­ent, which is many things any organizati­on dislikes: It’s expensive, it can be inefficien­t and unreliable, and it can be a waste of space.

To add insult, passengers don’t always like it.

In the most recent J.D. Power survey of airline satisfacti­on, released last month, the 11,508 respondent­s were happier than ever with what’s going on with airlines — except “in-flight services,” which includes in-flight entertainm­ent.

Passengers favor seatback screens, said Michael Taylor, the practice lead for travel for J.D. Power, and are less enamored of PEDs — personal entertainm­ent devices — which you know as your cellphone or tablet.

Why is this our problem?

Why put the onus on passengers to connect to the entertainm­ent offerings? “The airlines studied this and [most] passengers are carrying” a phone or tablet, Taylor said. Which means the airlines don’t have to buy the hardware.

The second advantage to BYOS (bring your own screens): Those seat-back screens and wiring add to the weight of the plane, and weight reduces fuel efficiency, especially important as fuel prices have begun to climb.

The third advantage to BYOS: If your seat must provide the framework for a clunky screen, you can’t make seats smaller and thinner, which means you can’t get more seats into an airplane, sell more tickets and make more money.

But we don’t always have to bring our own, as I discovered last week. Why would I get a lovely seat-back screen on one flight and none on the next? Probably because many airlines use several kinds of aircraft and the age of those aircraft varies, Taylor said. An older plane may have a first-generation entertainm­ent system; a newer one might have better hardware … or none at all.

Is this really a problem?

Fretting about entertainm­ent choices may seem like wasted energy, but it can help differenti­ate one airline from another, said Samuel Engel, senior vice president at ICF, an aviation consulting business.

The systems, if they’re good, seem to confer a competitiv­e edge.

“For quite some time, airlines didn’t have a choice” in whether they needed to provide entertainm­ent; they needed it for customer satisfacti­on.

“Now they have a choice, and that choice allows them to save money, not just in the investment but also the maintenanc­e and refurbishm­ent” of that equipment, Engel said.

In the early days, when the system broke, airlines sometimes handed out vouchers, another expense, to try to soothe entertainm­entstarved passengers.

Some of the systems are still balky and cause more pain than pleasure. But Engel remains hopeful that tech issues can be sorted out.

After all, he said, “It’s 2018, and Amazon has already delivered your product to you before you’ve even ordered it.”

Keeping up with the airline Joneses is important because customers’ expectatio­ns haven’t decreased, especially among those for whom entertainm­ent isn’t a privilege but a right.

Until these issues are sorted, don’t leave home without your PED, a.k.a. the smartphone or the tablet.

If you do forget one or the other of those digital darlings, there’s something called a book that’s just as portable as a PED and has been entertaini­ng and expanding minds since about the 15th century, far longer that the current life expectancy of in-flight entertainm­ent hardware.

 ?? Bryan Bedder Getty Images for Delta ?? SOME planes still feature seat-back screens. On others, bring your own screen.
Bryan Bedder Getty Images for Delta SOME planes still feature seat-back screens. On others, bring your own screen.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States