Los Angeles Times

School district set to dismiss official

With L.A. Unified leaders deadlocked over contract renewal, watchdog is likely to depart at end of June.

- By Howard Blume

The Los Angeles Board of Education has deadlocked over rehiring its top internal investigat­or, in effect dismissing him unless board members reconsider before the end of the month.

The board split over rehiring Inspector General Ken Bramlett during a confidenti­al closed-door portion of last week’s board meeting. His current contract expires at the end of June.

Bramlett’s departure would raise questions about the future of an office establishe­d as a watchdog over the nation’s second-largest school system.

Some critics — inside and outside L.A. Unified — say his departure could undermine accountabi­lity efforts, including overseeing independen­tly operated charter schools. Others say the board members who voted not to rehire Bramlett had lost confidence in him, especially in light of recent allegation­s that he had tolerated a hostile work environmen­t after employees complained about his chief deputy.

The school board tally was 3 to 3, with board member Ref Rodriguez abstaining, according to district

sources in senior management who were not authorized to speak on the record. The vote, which happened outside public view, was not announced even though California law requires the reporting of all actions taken.

Interviewe­d Friday, district general counsel David Holmquist declined to confirm the vote and said the board has no obligation to report a decision not to approve a proposed contract — for Bramlett or anyone else.

The vote was first reported by public radio station KPCC.

Bramlett, who has held the job for five years, declined to discuss his status, saying only: “I love this district, and I love the kids in the district.… I tried to do everything we could do to protect their resources so the district could give them everything it could.”

The votes against Bramlett came from a new majority bloc that took control last year. Its members were elected with substantia­l financial support from charter school advocates. On the other side were three board members who are retired school district administra­tors.

Rodriguez, who belongs to the charter-supported bloc, recused himself from the vote because he has been under investigat­ion by the inspector general’s office over allegation­s of conflicts of interest. Separately, Rodriguez faces criminal charges of political money laundering. He has denied wrongdoing.

Rodriguez’s recusal had the same effect as a vote against Bramlett, who fell one vote short of the needed majority.

Several charter schools have become mired in lengthy investigat­ions by Bramlett’s office. On a few occasions, such inquiries resulted in criminal charges; they also have contribute­d to recommenda­tions that the board vote to close certain schools.

L.A. Unified has more charters and charter students than any other school district. About 18% of LAUSD students are enrolled in charters.

After the charter-supported board majority took control last July, charter leaders pressed for changes to L.A. Unified oversight.

The charter wish list included limiting the reach of the inspector general. In a compromise last November, charters achieved some bureaucrat­ic relief but the inspector general’s authority remained intact.

Bramlett became vulnerable, however, as his threeyear contract neared an end, especially after recent allegation­s that his top deputy and senior investigat­or, Frank Cabibi, repeatedly made racially and sexually tinged comments. Cabibi, who could not be reached for comment, recently resigned.

Bramlett’s defenders contend that a full investigat­ion could exonerate Bramlett.

It’s unfair to let him go before this necessary fact-finding is complete, said former school board member David Tokofsky, who supported the original establishm­ent of the office about 20 years ago. He said he worried that the complaints could be a pretext to get rid of Bramlett and weaken the office’s authority.

L.A. Unified is the only California school district with an inspector general. The office was establishe­d as the district was beginning the nation’s largest school constructi­on program.

With that effort ended, it may be time to rethink whether that office’s central functions can be managed in other ways, potentiall­y saving money and preventing bureaucrat­ic overreach, said Myrna Castrejón, executive director of Great Public Schools Now, which helps fund the establishm­ent of new schools, including charters.

One vote against Bramlett was from board President Monica Garcia, the longest-serving board member; the others were from Nick Melvoin and Kelly Gonez, who’ve been in office for less than a year.

Melvoin and Gonez have been outspoken about the #MeToo movement and making sure that L.A. Unified does not tolerate lockerroom talk and other forms of sexual harassment.

Senior district officials declined to discuss Bramlett’s contract or the complaints. Bramlett declined to discuss the allegation­s.

“All complaints received in this office are taken very seriously,” he said. “And all are investigat­ed thoroughly and the appropriat­e action is taken.”

 ?? L.A. Unified School District ?? “I LOVE THIS district,” said Inspector General Ken Bramlett, left. He has held the job for five years.
L.A. Unified School District “I LOVE THIS district,” said Inspector General Ken Bramlett, left. He has held the job for five years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States