Los Angeles Times

Rail authority’s quality control

-

Re “High-speed rail bridge rejected,” June 9

An essential element of the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s project management program is to ensure our structures are built to specificat­ions that assure safety. While a recent Los Angeles Times article raised questions about the rigor of our project oversight, the inescapabl­e fact is that in the case cited in the article, the authority’s quality assurance program worked as it was intended.

The defective structure was discovered and the work was rejected far before it could be placed into service.

We are committed to ensuring the design and constructi­on of our civil infrastruc­ture is delivered in a manner that meets today’s safety standards. We do this in partnershi­p with the contractor, inspectors, constructi­on management teams and authority staff. All structures must be built to specificat­ions based on best practice engineerin­g standards. One structure type is not inherently safer than another, and mechanical­ly stabilized embankment­s — built to specificat­ions — have been widely used in California for decades without compromisi­ng the public’s safety.

Our quality assurance process worked. We will continue to ensure our contractor­s’ work meets today’s engineerin­g specificat­ions, and we will transparen­tly report on our constructi­on matters in our monthly constructi­on updates to our Board of Directors and its Finance and Audit Committee.

Scott Jarvis Sacramento The writer is chief engineer of the California High Speed Rail Authority.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States