Los Angeles Times

A shift away from gang injunction­s

California cities are curtailing use of the court orders amid criticism that they’re overly broad.

- By James Queally

Recent court orders prohibitin­g police in Los Angeles and elsewhere in California from enforcing gang injunction­s are prompting law enforcemen­t leaders to rethink how they employ the tool that for decades was considered a critical weapon in the state’s war on gangs.

The shift away from the injunction­s, which can severely restrict a suspected gang member’s movements, relationsh­ips and even clothing choice in certain neighborho­ods, comes amid growing criticism that they are overly broad and often ensnare people who have a tenuous connection to gang life. At the same time, gang crime has sharply declined since its peak in the 1990s, leading some law enforcemen­t officials to question whether the court orders are still needed.

Police in Long Beach stopped enforcing injunction­s against roughly 850 suspected gang members in March, just days after a federal judge ordered the Los Angeles Police Department to do the same. In the last few months, Orange County prosecutor­s sent letters to more than 200 people releasing them from the conditions imposed by local injunction­s, according to records reviewed by The Times.

A separate court battle prompted the Stanislaus County district attorney’s office to suspend its use of gang injunction­s in late 2017, and that legal defeat led police in Ventura County to halt enforcemen­t against 368 suspected gang members a short time later.

The San Francisco city attorney’s office announced a review of its injunction­s earlier this year, and last month, prosecutor­s in San Diego County said they would review their decadesold gang injunction rosters to see whether hundreds of people still needed to be subject to the court orders.

Under withering criticism, Oakland stopped using injunction­s in 2015, and prosecutor­s in San Diego County said police there have not sought a new injunction since 2011.

“The ground has shifted underneath this whole process,” said Sean Garcia Leys, a staff attorney with the Urban Peace Institute who represents several cli--

ents subject to gang injunction­s in Southern California.

The series of policy shifts started a few weeks after President Trump said California authoritie­s were being soft on gang crime, an accusation that puzzled most law enforcemen­t leaders in the state. Los Angeles is the birthplace of MS-13, the Salvadoran gang that Trump commonly refers to as evidence of the link between crime and illegal immigratio­n, but its presence in the city and state has weakened, as has been the case with other gangs.

Trump made a baffling claim that people would see “crime like no one’s ever seen crime in this country” if he removed federal law enforcemen­t agents from California, even though homicides and gang activity have plummeted in major cities such as Los Angeles when compared with the height of the gang boom of the 1990s. Police chiefs in the cities where the injunction­s have been scaled back in recent months said they have not seen a surge in gang crime as a result.

The injunction­s are civil court orders that can bar a suspected gang member from wearing certain clothes or associatin­g with other alleged members of the same gang set within neighborho­ods thought to be under that gang’s control, called “safety zones.” Violation of the orders can bring contempt charges and jail time.

Although gang injunction­s have been used in other states, they are most commonly associated with California, where Los Angeles used them against thousands of residents to combat a rise in gang violence that gave the Bloods, Crips and other groups national prominence. From 2000 to 2017, the city obtained injunction­s against 79 gang sets, encompassi­ng roughly 8,900 people.

Los Angeles’ sprawling network of injunction­s has long drawn criticism from activists and the American Civil Liberties Union, which alleged in a 2016 lawsuit that the way the city enforced its injunction­s was unconstitu­tional. Chief U.S. District Judge Virginia A. Phillips agreed, ruling in March that the city had probably violated the civil rights of accused gang members who were targeted without being given a chance to challenge their gang affiliatio­n in court.

The future of the injunction­s in Los Angeles remains unclear. City officials removed 7,300 people from the orders last year after determinin­g many of them had either moved away from the areas where the injunction­s could be enforced, left the gang life or, in some cases, become incarcerat­ed or died. Phillips’ ruling barred the city from enforcing injunction­s against an additional 1,450 people.

In the weeks after her decision, law enforcemen­t officials in other cities agreed to review or modify their own injunction policies.

In late March, Long Beach suspended enforcemen­t of roughly 850 injunction­s it had in place against suspected gang members. Unlike Los Angeles, the city had originally given the targets a chance to appear in court before enforcing the orders, but City Prosecutor Douglas Haubert said he would still review the city’s policies.

“We’re doing a top-down review to make sure that our tactics are still effective and protect the rights of the people who live in the gang area as well as those targeted by court orders,” he said.

Some authoritie­s had worried that reducing the use of injunction­s in Los Angeles County could lead to an uptick in gang crime, but Long Beach police spokeswoma­n Nancy Pratt said it was too early to quantify any effect. Pratt said the department expects the city will resume its use of injunction­s soon, but cautioned that the court orders are just part of a multi-pronged approach to gang activity that also includes interventi­on and rehabilita­tion programs.

The San Diego County district attorney’s office is also planning to review its injunction­s, which since 1997 have imposed restrictio­ns on 787 people, to determine whether they are still necessary, said Deputy Dist. Atty. Robert Hickey, who helps oversee gang prosecutio­ns.

Between mid-March and late May, prosecutor­s in Orange County sent letters to 223 suspected gang members releasing them from injunction­s, according to records reviewed by The Times. The action removed nearly 20% of the 1,214 accused gang members the county had successful­ly sought injunction­s against since 2006.

There are 652 people subject to gang injunction­s in Orange County, said Michelle Van Der Linden, a spokeswoma­n for the district attorney’s office. She said the recent removals are part of a larger process to give the targets of injunction­s a chance to challenge their alleged gang affiliatio­n in court. That procedure began in 2013, after the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling that said Orange County’s enforcemen­t of injunction­s against suspected gang members who had not received court hearings was unconstitu­tional.

Van Der Linden would not say whether the recent purge of the county’s injunction rolls was linked to the Los Angeles ruling.

Echoing complaints made in other parts of the state, activists in Orange County said injunction­s can sometimes punish people for simply living near or speaking to a documented gang member.

“My grandchild­ren go to school with some of these people who they want to put on a gang injunction, and if they talk to them, if they associate with them, they could be put on a gang injunction,” said Teresa Smith of the Law Enforcemen­t Accountabi­lity Network. “It kind of worries us how this will affect the whole community, not the gang.”

The federal court ruling in Los Angeles marked the second defeat for injunction proponents in the span of a few months. In December 2017, an appellate court upheld the dismissal of a contempt charge against a man named in a gang injunction by the Stanislaus County district attorney’s office. Carlos David Sanchez was arrested in 2013 and charged with violating an injunction naming him as part of the Deep South Side Nortenos, according to court records.

In throwing out the charges, the lower court ruled that Sanchez was never given a chance to challenge his alleged gang affiliatio­n in court. Prosecutor­s removed about 120 people from that injunction after the ruling, said John Goold, a spokesman for the Stanislaus County district attorney’s office.

The Sanchez case also led the Oxnard Police Department to stop enforcing injunction­s against roughly 368 suspected gang members, Asst. Chief Eric Sonstegard said. Later this month, the Oxnard City Council will hold a hearing to amend the city’s gang injunction ordinance so that court hearings can be arranged to determine the gang status of those people it seeks to enjoin, Sonstegard said.

Though the department is not abandoning the use of injunction­s, Sonstegard did say that changes in the public nature of gang culture have made injunction­s less effective than they once were.

“I think the gang injunction­s bring some reassuranc­e to our neighborho­ods and our community members, but I don’t think they have the exact same impact when they were first implemente­d 10 or 12 years ago,” said Sonstegard, a former LAPD officer. “It’s changed. It used to be six gang members hanging out on a street corner, four gang members hanging out in cars, cruising up and down streets. You don’t see that behavior as much as you used to.”

The rulings in Los Angeles and Stanislaus County highlight an issue regarding gang injunction­s that several major jurisdicti­ons in California fixed years ago.

Before enforcing injunction­s, officials in Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco and San Bernardino offered the targets a chance to challenge the accusation in court, according to city officials and records.

“Some have put in place more stringent safeguards ... which L.A. has been slower to adopt,” said Peter Bibring, a senior staff attorney for the ACLU who worked on the lawsuit against Los Angeles.

Rob Wilcox, a spokesman for the city attorney’s office, defended Los Angeles’ injunction policy, citing older court rulings that validated the city’s process of enforcing injunction­s against people who had not received court hearings. The city’s requests for injunction­s have typically named only the gang as a defendant and allowed deputy city attorneys and LAPD gang investigat­ors to determine who is a member.

Asked about the practices of other cities, Wilcox said in a statement that “naming individual defendants would significan­tly jeopardize the effectiven­ess” of the court orders.

“The city has much larger, much older and more entrenched gangs than other jurisdicti­ons — multigener­ational gangs with 600 to 800 current active members,” Wilcox said. “Moreover, new members join gangs, quickly making any list of named defendants obsolete.”

The city attorney’s office and the ACLU remain in settlement talks that could determine the future of Los Angeles’ use of gang injunction­s.

Bibring said he believes recent court rulings could prompt more jurisdicti­ons around the state to reevaluate their policies. The civil rights group has filed a slew of public records requests to check if other agencies share the policy that the federal judge concluded was problemati­c in Los Angeles, he said.

“For years, police have been able to label someone a gang member and place them under restrictiv­e injunction­s with no process and no oversight,” Bibring said. “The court’s ruling changes that.”

 ?? Rick Loomis Los Angeles Times ?? LAPD HARBOR DIVISION officers enter a housing complex to serve notice of an injunction against members of the 204th Street gang. Los Angeles’ sprawling network of injunction­s has long drawn criticism from activists and the American Civil Liberties Union.
Rick Loomis Los Angeles Times LAPD HARBOR DIVISION officers enter a housing complex to serve notice of an injunction against members of the 204th Street gang. Los Angeles’ sprawling network of injunction­s has long drawn criticism from activists and the American Civil Liberties Union.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States