Los Angeles Times

Migrants’ best bet might be Mexico

- By Wayne A. Cornelius Wayne Cornelius is a faculty teaching fellow at Reed College and director emeritus of the Mexican Migration Field Research Program at UC San Diego.

Every harsh move the Trump administra­tion makes on the southweste­rn border is designed to deter Central Americans from traveling to the United States. It blocks them at legal ports of entry, holds others in indefinite detention, and has drasticall­y restricted who can even ask for asylum. But there is no evidence that the flow of migrants is slowing in response, nor are these people going home.

Turned-back migrants are piling up in privately operated shelters and makeshift camps in Mexican border cities. Will they be allowed to stay, at least, in Mexico?

Some wait in hope that U.S. authoritie­s will still grant them a “credible fear” interview to determine if they can even ask for asylum. But that’s increasing­ly unlikely. Last month, Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions ruled that U.S. asylum law does not offer protection to those affected by domestic abuse, gang crimes or drug-traffic-related violence. Only “public” violence — that is, being victimized directly by your government — qualifies a person to ask for asylum, according to the attorney general.

This radical reinterpre­tation excludes, by some lawyers’ estimates, more than 85% of transit migrants — those who have crossed Mexico from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador to get to the southweste­rn U.S. border.

The Trump administra­tion characteri­zes these transit migrants as disguised economic refugees, but it is impossible to disentangl­e their economic from their personal safety concerns. Recent field interviews suggest that most are driven to leave by a combinatio­n of factors, including gang-related violence and lack of economic opportunit­ies. Some have been personally threatened by gangs; others have relatives who have been harmed; still others, like small business owners, have been targets of gang extortion. Either way, they perceived the risks involved in crossing Mexico to get into the United States as lower than the evident dangers of staying home.

For now, they are bottled up within Mexico. So what will Mexico do?

There’s a good chance that Mexico will deport many of them. Under President Enrique Peña Nieto’s Southern Border Program, enacted in 2014 in response to U.S. pressure, deportatio­ns have doubled. By 2015, Mexico was deporting more Central American migrants than the United States, belying President Trump’s claim that Mexico “does nothing” to stop migrants trying to reach the United States.

Earlier this year, the Trump administra­tion pressed the Mexican government to sign a bilateral “safe third country” agreement, under which U.S. officials could turn away most asylum-seekers at the border and compel them to petition for protection in Mexico instead. The negotiatio­ns went nowhere, but the Trump administra­tion has essentiall­y enacted this policy unilateral­ly by disallowin­g so many asylum claims.

As a result, Mexico’s asylum program is straining under the increasing numbers of mostly Central American migrants seeking protection there. In 2017, 14,596 people applied for asylum in Mexico — an 11-fold increase from 2013. This year, the number of applicants could reach 25,000 or more.

Although it has improved in recent years, Mexico’s asylum program remains understaff­ed and underfunde­d, and many transit migrants don’t know they can ask for refuge there. Still, the option of seeking asylum in Mexico will become increasing­ly attractive — or the only option — given the sharp restrictio­n of the grounds for asylum claims in the United States.

Moreover, those who apply for asylum in Mexico have a greater chance of success. In 2017, 64% of completed cases won protection, up from 37% in 2013. Petitioner­s may have to wait three or four months to have their cases resolved, but that’s nothing. In the United States, upwards of 715,000 cases are backlogged in the immigratio­n court system. Asylum claims can take six years or more to adjudicate, and approval rates for applicants from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador are extremely low.

Mexican authoritie­s also have been more humane to asylum applicants, releasing them from detention while their cases are processed. In the United States, only after a bruising political fight over separating migrant parents and children has the Trump administra­tion relented. On Tuesday, it said it will release families with ankle bracelet monitoring while their asylum claims are assessed. Most solo asylum-seekers are still being held in immigratio­n prisons.

Some asylum-seekers turned away by U.S. border officials are hiring Mexican coyotes to help them enter the United States clandestin­ely. But many other migrants who face life-threatenin­g conditions in their home countries may now have no better option than staying put — for as long as possible — in Mexico.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States