Don’t forget to visit LACMA

Re “Why not put LACMA’s art in South L.A.?” editorial, July 16

Bringing art into the community, as the Los Angeles County Museum of Art proposes to do by opening several satellite locations, is never a bad idea. However, part of the experience of viewing art is in the place where it is viewed.

Having just returned from a European trip where I visited several museums that are in amazing buildings, I realized the importance of why I love going to art museums — not to mention that all of them were free of charge. Maybe free admission can be part of new incentives to bring more people from “outlining communities” to this beautiful art museum. Sherry Davis

Playa Vista

It’s ironic that, while most of America’s cultural history is heavily indebted to the contributions of low-income Americans and African Americans, so few of their contributions are allowed in the galleries and museums organized by elites.

The bitterest irony can’t be as easily cast aside: A LACMA campus in South L.A., without robust tenant protections and affordable housing attached, would ultimately displace the community it would be trying to serve.

Any advocacy for such a campus without this consideration in mind is irresponsible and out of touch.

Stephano Medina

Los Angeles ::

Why doesn’t LACMA take advantage of huge retail spaces in malls that are not fully occupied?

Use one of the empty “anchor” stores as the museum and a cluster of smaller stores providing arts and craft supplies (and maybe workshops), coffeetable books and other art reproductions. Maybe even include a food court where a museum-goer is more likely to find a croque madame than a hamburger.

You can leverage existing parking, customer traffic and security. The building itself may not be state-ofthe-art, but what is the overriding purpose of establishing these satellites to begin with? Christian Volz

Redondo Beach