Los Angeles Times

Opposition party seeks Cambodia vote boycott

- By Holly Robertson

PHNOM PENH, Cambodia — There may be 20 political parties competing in Cambodia’s general elections Sunday, but for opposition supporters such as Sin Chan Pov Rozeth, there really is no choice at all.

Rozeth, a former rising star in local politics who now runs a noodle shop in Battambang province, is preparing to heed a call from exiled opposition leaders to boycott the vote, which has been described as “undemocrat­ic” and a “sham” by critics.

“It is my right to go to vote, but when there is no party that I love, I don’t necessaril­y need to go,” she says. “I’d prefer to stay home.”

Opposition leader Kem Sokha was jailed late last year after being accused of plotting with the U.S. to topple the Cambodian government, and his Cambodia National Rescue Party was dissolved by a court controlled by allies of Hun Sen, the country’s authoritar­ian prime minister.

The crackdown, which also silenced independen­t media and was criticized by rights groups, prompted National Rescue Party lawmakers to flee abroad, in effect crushing Cambodia’s opposition movement.

With most senior opposition figures banned from politics for five years and no realistic prospect of minor parties mounting a serious challenge, the ruling Cambodian People’s Party appears set to secure an easy victory in the balloting.

Yet it seems that extending Hun Sen’s 33 years in office — he is one of the world’s longest-serving leaders — may not be enough. In response to the boycott calls, the Cambodia People’s Party has repeatedly warned that it is “illegal” to not vote, even though voting is not compulsory. That warning means voter turnout will probably be seen as a barometer of the party’s legitimacy. Amid a climate of fear that has swept the country, outspoken National Rescue Party loyalists who are supporting the “clean finger” campaign — a reference to the purple ink used to stain the index finger of those who cast a ballot — are finding themselves under pressure.

Rozeth says she is regularly harassed at her noodle shop by plaincloth­es officers on motorbikes. “I’m so used to it now,” she says. And several other activists in Battambang are facing incitement charges after posting photograph­s on Facebook showing their inkless index fingers raised proudly.

Sam Rainsy, who resigned as a National Rescue Party leader under government pressure in early 2017 before going into exile, said in a call from Paris that supporters who are scared to boycott the vote could still show up at the polls and simply deface their ballots so they couldn’t be counted.

“I think the consequenc­es would be very bad if we endorse a fake election by taking part in [it] — you just legitimize an illegitima­te election, an illegitima­te leadership,” Rainsy said. “When we were dissolved, the voice of half the electorate was suppressed. We cannot participat­e in a farce.”

During the election campaign, which began July 7 and ends Friday, only the Cambodian People’s Party has been able to draw sizable crowds at political rallies, with well-organized but subdued procession­s of tuk-tuks (three-wheeled motorized rickshaws) and motorbikes winding through the streets of Phnom Penh. Many participan­ts, though, said they were paid to participat­e.

Hun Sen, a former Khmer Rouge commander who defected to Vietnam in 1977, is seen by many followers as a strong leader who helped bring down the murderous regime in 1979 and is credited with shepherdin­g in an era of rapid growth and developmen­t. In speeches, he often warns that Cambodia would backslide into war and chaos without his guiding hand.

“The party liberated me from the Pol Pot regime,” said Chum Sarin, 62, at a rally in Phnom Penh last weekend. “I want Hun Sen to lead the country forever and I will support him until he dies.”

The internatio­nal community is less impressed, however. Rhona Smith, the United Nations special rapporteur on human rights in Cambodia, said voter intimidati­on in the lead-up to the elections had created “a climate of fear and confusion.”

The U.S. and European Union have pulled election funding and did not send observers to monitor the vote. Reuters reported Wednesday that Japan, another major donor that did offer financial support for the vote, decided to not send observers.

Instead, observers will come from 52 other organizati­ons and countries including China, Myanmar and Indonesia, according to the National Election Committee. Some contend that oversight from such countries will carry little weight.

Lee Morgenbess­er, an academic at Australia’s Griffith University who studies authoritar­ian regimes, said that some of the organizati­ons listed, including the Shanghai Cooperatio­n Organizati­on and the Internatio­nal Conference of Asian Political Parties, are “shadow” observer groups whose role is only to make it appear that the elections are competitiv­e and fraud-free.

In a WhatsApp message, Cambodia People’s Party spokesman Sous Yara defended the election observers as independen­t and said their assessment should be trusted rather than those of “a small number of traditiona­lly negative thinkers toward Cambodia and our people.”

Robertson is a special correspond­ent.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States