Los Angeles Times

Monsanto found liable for man’s lymphoma

Groundskee­per who claimed weed killer caused his illness is awarded $289 million.

- By Geoffrey Mohan geoffrey.mohan @latimes.com

A San Francisco jury on Friday found Monsanto liable for a school groundskee­per’s lymphoma that he said developed after years of applying the company’s trademarke­d Roundup weed killer.

The $289-million verdict in San Francisco County Superior Court is certain to add momentum to a multifront battle to ban Roundup’s main active ingredient, glyphosate. The compound is applied to millions of acres of crops, many of which have been geneticall­y modified to withstand the herbicide.

The jury deliberate­d three days before awarding $39 million in compensato­ry damages and $250 million in punitive damages to groundskee­per DeWayne Lee Johnson, 46. He claimed that years of applying Monsanto’s Roundup and Ranger Pro to school properties in a Bay Area suburb of Benicia caused his incurable nonHodgkin’s lymphoma.

Activists, who have long battled to ban glyphosate, lauded the decision in the closely watched trial.

“Monsanto made Roundup the OxyContin of pesticides, and now the addiction and damage they caused have come home to roost,” said Ken Cook, president of Environmen­tal Working Group. “This won’t cure DeWayne Lee Johnson’s cancer, but it will send a strong message to a renegade company.”

The verdict “signals a turning tide,” said Linda Wells, Midwest organizing director for Pesticide Action Network. “It’s time to get carcinogen­ic pesticides off the market, and fight for the protective regulation­s we all deserve,” Wells said.

Monsanto, which continues to be run independen­tly after merging this year with German agro-industrial giant Bayer AG, said it will appeal the verdict.

“We are sympatheti­c to Mr. Johnson and his family,” said Scott Partridge, Monsanto’s vice president of global strategy. “Today’s decision does not change the fact that more than 800 scientific studies and reviews — and conclusion­s by the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency, the U.S. National Institutes of Health and regulatory authoritie­s around the world — support the fact that glyphosate does not cause cancer, and did not cause Mr. Johnson’s cancer.”

Nationwide, growers have used an estimated 1.8 million tons of the chemical since it was introduced in the mid-1970s, according to government and industry estimates.

The bulk of glyphosate was sprayed on tens of millions of acres of corn and soy in the Midwest. But California growers also applied it to more than 200 crops across 4 million acres, including 1.5 million acres of almonds, making it their most widely used herbicide, according to the California Department of Pesticide Regulation.

Having inherited a company long vilified by environmen­tal activists as “Monsatan,” Bayer faces high potential liabilitie­s from hundreds of similar lawsuits, along with a battle over adding a cancer warning label on products sold in California.

A U.S. district judge this year temporaril­y halted moves by California to require a cancer warning label under Propositio­n 65, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcemen­t Act, passed by voters in 1986.

California’s decision to include glyphosate on its list of chemicals linked to cancer followed a 2015 ruling by the Europe-based Internatio­nal Agency for Research on Cancer that the chemical is a “probable” carcinogen.

The U.S. EPA as well as its counterpar­t agencies in the European Union have disagreed with the conclusion reached by that panel, which is part of the World Health Organizati­on. Last December, the EPA ruled that glyphosate was “not likely” to cause cancer.

California’s Office of Environmen­tal Health Hazard Assessment, the agency that listed the chemical as a probable carcinogen, is finalizing its regulation establishi­ng a “safe” threshold under which glyphosate products would be exempt from the Propositio­n 65 warning provisions.

‘Monsanto made Roundup the OxyContin of pesticides, and now the addiction and damage they caused have come home to roost.’ — Ken Cook, Environmen­tal Working Group

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States