Los Angeles Times

New ploy to undermine species act

- MICHAEL HILTZIK

Just two days after President Trump issued an utterly uninformed tweet about the causes of the California wildfires, his ulterior motives began to come into focus.

That happened through an order issued Wednesday by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross to the National Marine Fisheries Service and its parent agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheri­c Administra­tion. Both fall under Ross’ jurisdicti­on.

The order directs the agencies to “facilitate access to the water needed to fight the ongoing wildfires affecting the State of California.” It then gives the game away by making specific reference to the federal Endangered Species Act: “Consistent with the emergency consultati­on provisions under the ESA, Federal agencies may use any water as necessary to protect life and property in the affected areas,” the order says.

Environmen­tal experts aren’t buying Ross’ statement.

“Secretary Ross’s directive is nothing more than a smokescree­n designed to weaken these protection­s that NMFS’s scientists determined are necessary to keep these native fish from going extinct,” Kate Poole of the Natural Resources Defense Council said after the statement was issued. “It’s almost like the extinction of these creatures is their real goal, so that they no longer have to leave any water in rivers, but can divert it all to corporate agribusine­ss.”

Here’s the context: Trump on Monday issued what we called a “strikingly ignorant” tweet blaming the wildfires on “bad environmen­tal laws which aren’t allowing massive amount of readily available water to be properly utilized.” We observed that this seemed to conflate two issues.

One is the long-term whining by growers in the Central Valley, a Republican stronghold, that environmen­tal rules (including the Endangered Species Act) have forced the diversion of water they want for irriga-

tion into rivers. The river flows are needed to protect fish and fisheries, and are required under federal law and in accordance with court rulings.

The other issue is water for fighting the wildfires. As numerous expert sources have made plain, there is no shortage of water for this purpose. Major reservoirs are fully accessible to the fire zones, and they’re at or near historical capacities.

“At this point, water supply hasn’t affected any of our operations,” Mike Mohler, deputy director of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or Cal Fire, told me Wednesday. The key factors in the intensity and spread of the fires are, as before, “hot and dry weather conditions.”

Ross’ statement made specific mention of the Mendocino Complex fire, which he noted “has developed into the largest in the state’s history, consuming nearly 300,000 acres in Northern California.” But the Mendocino Complex fire is immediatel­y adjacent to Clear Lake, a major reservoir. Mohler said firefighte­rs have been drawing water from Clear Lake without any limitation­s.

The Commerce Department didn’t immediatel­y respond to my inquiry about what Ross has in mind, or what actions could be taken by NOAA and the fisheries service to respond to the current emergency. But Ross’ reference to the Endangered Species Act strongly suggests that he intends to bootstrap the wildfires into serving the administra­tion’s existing efforts to undermine the act for the benefit of its cronies in Central Valley agricultur­e.

It’s also plausible that the federal government is trying to circumvent regulation­s governing the storage of water in the federally controlled Shasta Lake, the state’s largest reservoir. The rules are designed to protect salmon smolt in the Sacramento River, more than 95% of which were destroyed in 2014 and 2015 by releases of water that was too warm for them to survive.

Regulation­s put in place after that disaster required water to be held in storage to the end of the year, so more cold water is available for the young salmon. But that reduces the water available for irrigation during the fall. Conceivabl­y, Ross’ order could allow the reservoir to release water now — a boon to farmers, but a calamity for the salmon fishery. Importantl­y, releasing water now would do nothing to assist firefighte­rs.

As we’ve reported, the Bureau of Reclamatio­n, an Interior Department agency, has proposed changes in both state and federal water projects to “maximize water deliveries” to non-environmen­tal users and consider “modificati­ons to regulatory requiremen­ts” establishe­d by the biological opinions.

Meanwhile, the Interior and Commerce department­s have jointly proposed changes in the federal Endangered Species Act that would shrink the roster of species granted legal protection­s and loosen the rules protecting those that remain on the list.

Ross’ order certainly looks like a transparen­t attempt to expand that campaign. Ross hinted as much. His order not only directed NOAA to “facilitate the use of water for this emergency,” but stated that “going forward, the Department and NOAA are committed to finding new solutions to address threatened and endangered species in the context of the challengin­g water management situation in California.”

That certainly sounds like plans to shrink protection­s for threatened and endangered species by invoking all aspects of the “water management situation” in the state — including serving the growers. Anyone concerned with trying to fashion rational water policy in the face of politicall­y self-interested interferen­ce out of Washington should take heed. The Trump administra­tion just signaled that it will stop at nothing, no matter how illogical.

 ?? Marcio Jose Sanchez Associated Press ?? REGULATION­S WERE put in place to protect salmon smolt after more than 95% were destroyed in 2014 and 2015 by releases of water that was too warm.
Marcio Jose Sanchez Associated Press REGULATION­S WERE put in place to protect salmon smolt after more than 95% were destroyed in 2014 and 2015 by releases of water that was too warm.
 ??  ??
 ?? Kent Nishimura Los Angeles Times ?? FEDERAL RULES govern the storage of water in Shasta Lake to safeguard salmon smolt. Two U.S. agencies have proposed changes to the Endangered Species Act to shrink the roster of species granted legal protection­s.
Kent Nishimura Los Angeles Times FEDERAL RULES govern the storage of water in Shasta Lake to safeguard salmon smolt. Two U.S. agencies have proposed changes to the Endangered Species Act to shrink the roster of species granted legal protection­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States