Los Angeles Times

Journalist cameos should end

Real news people add authentici­ty to films, but they shouldn’t be in the business of blurring fact and fantasy.

- By Keith Oppenheim

“Mission: Impossible — Fallout” has been attracting a lot of moviegoers with some clever sequences, including one just before the opening credits. The real Wolf Blitzer plays a fake Wolf Blitzer. Fans of the franchise know that the Impossible Missions Force — or IMF — is adept at creating masks. In this bit, the team tricks an evil nuclear scientist into coughing up informatio­n by appearing to accede to his demand that CNN broadcast his manifesto.

There’s Blitzer on the small screen, reading the evil screed. But it’s all a fake. Once the intelligen­ce is in hand, “Blitzer” pulls off his mask to reveal himself as one of the IMF agents. And then, the “Mission Impossible” music. So very cool.

Except that it’s totally uncool. Shtick like that really damages the news media’s credibilit­y at a time when it can least afford it. Back in 1974, the great Walter Cronkite, succumbing to network pressure, made a quick cameo in an episode of “The Mary Tyler Moore Show.” As problemati­c as that was, it was a rare thing; the wall between news and entertainm­ent was still intact. But no longer.

In 1997, the movie “Contact,” about extraterre­strial research, drew heavy criticism because it was so loaded with CNN anchors and reporters. The head of the network called for an end to putting on-air staff in films.

Such scruples were short-lived. The number of famous journalist­s in movies and TV series has exploded. HBO’s “House of Cards” had Rachel Maddow, George Stephanopo­ulos and Lester Holt playing themselves. “Batman vs. Superman” featured Anderson Cooper and Soledad O’Brien, and there are plenty of other examples.

Journalist­s aren’t immune from celebrity, and they like the paycheck that comes with it, but what really drives this is that huge media companies such as CNN’s parent, WarnerMedi­a, own a news network, movie distributo­rs and production companies. From a business perspectiv­e, featuring network stars in fictional movies under the same corporate umbrella is cross-promotion, a win-win. Viewers and moviemaker­s probably like it because real news people add authentici­ty to the story.

Problem is, what burnishes fiction tarnishes fact, along with the journalist­s and outlets they represent. On social media, where many of us get our news, stories from reliable sources are right up against lies and chicanery. The public must constantly discrimina­te between truth and falsehoods. Fake-news sites plagued the 2016 election, and we have a president who continuall­y assaults the veracity of journalism. His predominan­t target is CNN.

So why would CNN or WarnerMedi­a think it would be a good idea for Blitzer to play himself, and then turn out to be a Wolf in IMF clothing? Blitzer himself should have seen the problem with that.

CNN deserves credit for trying to serve the world with important, verified, accurate informatio­n. And journalist­s who are doing good work probably think movie cameos are the least of the problems facing news media. They may even buy into the idea that showing up in movies is “good for the brand.” But that kind of thinking ignores what the brand is. CNN stands for what’s true, and newscaster­s simply shouldn’t feed the blur between truth and fantasy.

Keep news staff in the field and in the newsroom — and off the set.

Keith Oppenheim is an associate professor of broadcast media production at Champlain College in Burlington, Vt., and a former correspond­ent for CNN.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States