Los Angeles Times

The anti-poverty debate

-

Re: “Poverty programs worked, so let’s get rid of them?” Aug. 10

So the Trump White House’s Council of Economic Advisors reports that “fortunatel­y homelessne­ss is rare in the United States.” If any of these certifiabl­y compassion­free advisors took a look around Los Angeles, or any city and town in the country, they might have their eyes opened.

But as that’s unlikely to happen, it’s up to the rest of us to realize that there but for fortune go you and go I. We must help those struggling with homelessne­ss however we can. Bennett Tramer

Santa Monica

First, let’s admit that the poverty programs do not work or we wouldn’t be talking about poverty today.

The Trump administra­tion is desperatel­y trying to encourage Americans to take responsibi­lity for their lives and for their destinies. That involves deciding how to make a living instead of depending on the government. If we want to be a free society, taking personal responsibi­lity is essential.

Second, aside from the fact that it is not the government’s job to feed, clothe and house people, the social welfare programs have contribute­d to the bankruptin­g of our government. The argument that the rich can pay for it is false. If they gave all of their money, it still would not fix the problem. Take a look at the national debt. It is serious. Andrea Anderson

Glassell Park

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States