Los Angeles Times

Devin Nunes’ disappeari­ng act

- By Jacques Leslie t’s arguable Jacques Leslie is a contributi­ng writer to Opinion.

Iwhether Devin Nunes is really representi­ng California’s 22nd Congressio­nal District. True, he has been reelected seven times since 2002, when he first won in what was then the 21st District. But these days Nunes appears focused on parlaying his role as President Trump’s most ardent lapdog into national media stardom, even when doing so conflicts with the 22nd’s interests. And the district is noticing.

As chair of the House Intelligen­ce Committee, Nunes is often interviewe­d by right-wing Fox News broadcaste­rs such as Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson. But local political observers including Fresno Bee columnist Marek Warszawski say he hasn’t held a local town hall for years. The district, which encompasse­s parts of Fresno and Tulare counties, is predominan­tly agricultur­al, but Nunes hasn’t taken a position on two of ag’s most pressing issues, trade and immigratio­n, apparently because district sentiment — pro-free trade and pro-immigratio­n — runs counter to Trump’s policies.

And even though Fresno, the biggest city in the district, last month experience­d a record 22 consecutiv­e days with highs of more than 100 degrees, Nunes invokes the Trumpian hallucinat­ion that climate change isn’t real.

When he arrived in Washington as a freshman congressma­n in 2003, Nunes was what Warszawski called “a salt-of-the-earth dairy farmer from Pixley who would represent our interests without sinking into the Washington cesspool.” That was before Nunes learned how to swim in it — at about the same time the Trump era began.

Thrust into prominence by the Intelligen­ce Committee’s role in investigat­ing the Trump campaign’s Russia connection­s, Nunes has delighted the president’s supporters by turning congressio­nal norms upside down: Instead of conducting a genuine probe of the campaign, he has tried to investigat­e the investigat­ors, endeavorin­g to use his committee’s powers to show that intelligen­ce officials perpetrate­d a hoax to discredit the 2016 election.

He now travels the country to raise money and campaign for other Republican­s, with at least 15 events scheduled between midJuly and the election, according to the conservati­ve Washington Examiner. His new-found notoriety has swollen his own campaign coffers — as of mid-summer, he had amassed $7.4 million, the most of any California Republican congressma­n, and three to seven times the amounts he collected in previous campaigns.

Nunes is no investigat­or, but he plays one on TV. In March 2017, he dramatical­ly announced that intelligen­ce sources had given him documents proving that government agencies had conducted surveillan­ce of the Trump campaign, and he personally debriefed Trump on their contents.

Then the New York Times identified two White House staffers as Nunes’ sources, exposing the episode as a political stunt and Nunes as the stooge who brought about the spectacle of the White House briefing itself. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Nunes was running “an Inspector Clouseau investigat­ion.”

Early this year, Nunes claimed that the FBI’s court applicatio­n requesting permission to surveil a Trump campaign aide as part of its Russia investigat­ion was based solely on the notorious Steele dossier, and that the applicatio­n deviously omitted the Clinton campaign’s role in commission­ing it. But when the redacted court order was released last month at Nunes’ insistence, it refuted his claims. The request wasn’t based solely on the Steele dossier, and it included a page-long explanatio­n of the dossier’s origins.

Now Nunes contends that confirmati­on of his claims of bias in the FBI investigat­ion is hidden in the unredacted portions of the applicatio­n. Richard M. Burr, the North Carolina Republican who chairs the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee, doesn’t buy it: He said “sound reasons” existed for the FBI’s surveillan­ce.

Nunes follows the Trump playbook: Lie. If caught, double down. Throw accusation­s back at the source. Proclaim “fake news.” He has run television and radio ads denouncing the Fresno Bee and calling it “a left-wing rag,” an especially shameless charge considerin­g that the Bee endorsed Nunes in every congressio­nal election since 2002. But the Bee and other outlets also have reported that since 2013, Nunes has used political donations to pay for lavish Las Vegas trips, limousine travel, winery tours and $15,000 worth of tickets to NBA games featuring his favorite team, the far-from-the-22nd-District Boston Celtics.

Nunes protests that he didn’t break any rules. Still, all this could make him vulnerable in November. Three polling outlets rate the 22nd District as “safe Republican,” and a June 28 Public Policy Polling survey put Nunes ahead of his Democratic challenger, a 34-yearold prosecutor named Andrew Janz, by 8 points, 49% to 41%. That sounds like a big lead, but in 2016, Nunes beat his opponent 68% to 32%.

Even among some reliably Republican voters — farmers — there may be signs of ambivalenc­e. Last month, two agricultur­al industry leaders, the presidents of Western Growers and the California Farm Bureau Federation, published an op-ed in the Bee that praised three San Joaquin Valley Republican congressme­n for addressing the valley’s farm labor shortage by fighting for pro-immigratio­n legislatio­n. They pointedly omitted Nunes.

Nunes’ mind isn’t on farm labor right now. A notable New Yorker cover following Trump’s ludicrous summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin showed the president flat on his face at the bottom of the Trump Tower escalator, still vainglorio­usly signaling thumbs up. Enlarge the frame, and Nunes would be at his side, signaling a thumbs-up right back.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States