Troops accused of rights abuses in Rio

RIO DE JANEIRO — Residents in a Rio de Janeiro neighborhood where thousands of troops recently conducted operations protested rough-handed tactics on Wednesday, as Brazil’s military announced the third death of a soldier killed in clashes.

Members of rights groups with the Rio public defender’s office walked through the streets of Penha and listened to accusations involving human rights violations by soldiers who conducted major operations this week. Those accusations included killing and leaving the bodies of several young men in a forest above the complex of slums.

“In addition to the rights frequently violated, like entering homes [without a warrant], mistreatment and torture, there is an even more grave situation,” said Pedro Strozenberg from Rio’s public defender’s office. “It’s [accusations of] homicides, deaths and bodies hidden in the forest.”

Soldiers patrolling the area did not let media or human rights groups access the forest. The accusations about the bodies could not immediately be confirmed.

An email sent to the military command asking for comment Wednesday was not immediately answered.

Meanwhile, a soldier died Wednesday of the wounds he sustained in a shootout this week with suspected drug traffickers.

He was the third soldier to be killed in Monday’s confrontations between soldiers and armed traffickers in the neighborhoods of Penha, Mare and Complexo do Alemao. Five suspects were killed and 10 others were arrested.

The troop deaths this week are likely to raise new questions about the controversial “federal intervention.” The military was put in charge of security in Rio de Janeiro state this year after muggings and beatings were caught on camera during the Carnival celebration. Soldiers have mostly played supporting roles to police during operations, but on Monday they were clearly in the lead.

The intervention put thousands of soldiers in the streets and increased operations against drug gangs that control many of Rio’s more than 1,000 favelas ,or slums. Critics argue it has targeted poor people, particularly blacks, and done nothing to address underlying issues such as unemployment and income inequality.