Los Angeles Times

No, your phone bill won’t rise

- Pponents of

Oa net neutrality proposal that would bar Verizon, Comcast and other broadband providers from meddling with California­ns’ internet traffic have been robocallin­g senior citizens to warn them that the legislatio­n would raise their cellphone bills. It’s a scare tactic that consumers and their representa­tives in Sacramento should dismiss.

At issue is Senate Bill 822 by Sens. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles), which would prohibit broadband providers from blocking, slowing down or otherwise interferin­g with legal transmissi­ons on their data networks. It faces do-or-die votes this week in the state Assembly and Senate.

The robocalls, which were sponsored by a lobbying firm for broadband providers, delivered this message: “Your Assembly member will be voting on a proposal by San Francisco politician­s that could increase your cellphone bill by $30 a month and slow down your data.”

The arithmetic is, shall we say, inventive. Broadband providers claim that cellphone rates would go up and service would degrade in part because SB 822 would prohibit them from collecting millions of dollars in fees from companies that interconne­ct with the providers’ networks to deliver data. But the bill would not ban “interconne­ction” fees; it would simply bar broadband providers from meddling with consumers’ data as it was being delivered to their networks.

SB 822 would also prohibit phone and cable companies from letting websites subsidize the consumers who use their services by paying their data charges. But that doesn’t mean consumers’ bills would automatica­lly go up. Some European countries have imposed this sort of restrictio­n, yet mobile phone users there have higher data caps and lower data prices.

The point behind the legislatio­n isn’t to raise or lower cellphone bills; it’s to restore for California­ns the net neutrality rules that the Federal Communicat­ions Commission repealed after Republican­s took control in 2017. Those rules were designed to protect the openness and freedom from interferen­ce that have made the internet such a powerful source of opportunit­y and innovation.

The idea behind net neutrality is that internet users, not the companies that connect them, should determine what’s popular, which business models succeed, and what informatio­n flows across the net. SB 822 would give California­ns and the websites they use a measure of protection that the federal government ought to provide, but no longer does.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States